KZNSeagull
Well-known member
Speculation on Sky that the two operations should have been simultaneous, but the supermarket one was delayed because other news crews were filming too close to the supermarket and had to be moved first.
They still haven't found the woman terrorist!
Apparently they cut off phones as the two hostage sites were talking to each other hence trying to storm both buildings at the same time.
French media saying that there were two gunmen in the supermarket, the second an unknown male who has escaped!
That was reported as the woman who has got away.
It was the same story when that plane got into trouble a couple of weeks ago.Don't know if any other NSC's have done this at all over the last 2 days, but flicking between Sky News and and BBC News, Sky News in the main seems streets ahead.
BBC are often slow on new key news, have inferior footage, and have a series of their high-brow 'correspondents' or French policians brought out for pompous discussions.
In contrast, SkyNews appear very quick on the feet to new developments, have interesting live footage and give viewers new facts very promptly.
Just my observations.
Don't know if any other NSC's have done this at all over the last 2 days, but flicking between Sky News and and BBC News, Sky News in the main seems streets ahead.
BBC are often slow on new key news, have inferior footage, and have a series of their high-brow 'correspondents' or French policians brought out for pompous discussions.
In contrast, SkyNews appear very quick on the feet to new developments, have interesting live footage and give viewers new facts very promptly.
Just my observations.
Sky often get things wrong though.
I would not be surprised if the gunmen in the printworks were watching the special forces driving into the industrial estate on the tv and then decided to try to make a break for it as a result. Whilst watching these things evolving live is interesting, live tv coverage at these events cannot be helpful to those trying to resolve the situation.
If they were bothered, they'd have simply cut off the power to the building, surely.
Quite. It's also an option to shut down local mobile phone networks and impose intense electronic countermeasures on the immediate area in order to suppress communications equipment such as mobile phones a) to disrupt signals to explosive devices and b) to prevent communication with accomplices who might be co-ordinating tactics and remotely feeding back information about the police siege.
Conversely as in this case it may have been considered a higher priority to allow mobile phone calls, for example to eavesdrop and potentially trace unknown accomplices. So not always a straightforward decision.