Barrel of Fun
Abort, retry, fail
Double post.
Just to complete the set:
Murray:
18 plus 3 in the League - 11 goals
FA cup - 4 plus 1 - no goals
Sandaza (according to seagulls.co.uk - thought he'd scored more in the League):
1 league game plus 4 as sub - 1 goal
1 fa cup plus 2 sub - 2 goals
I don't think he would since that was right after the FC United game which messed up the whole penalty taker situation.
3 less goals in a few more appearances isn't really roughly the same either, over the course of a season.
Barnes is a decent player, but I don't tihnk there's much comparison with Austin at the moment.
0b. £1.5m plus Murray? Utter nonsense.
0
Why is it nonsense? Serious answer please?
I think from a business sense it would make alot of sense.
:
£1million plus Chris Holroyd, shake hands and everyone is a winner.
But, like Acker, I'll believe it when I see it. Fantastic player, but I kind of hope it doesn't happen. I won't mind if it does though!
Let's get this straight:
Poyet, who regards Murray as one of, if not THE best strikers in the league, is going to give him to Swindon, plus £1.5mill for Austin??
Exactly right.Let's get this straight:
Poyet, who regards Murray as one of, if not THE best strikers in the league, is going to give him to Swindon, plus £1.5mill for Austin??
WHAT THE f*** ARE PEOPLE ON ON THIS SITE??
Why does ANYONE include Murray in talks about getting Austin? Totally illogical. We would need Austin alongside Murray, not instead of. They're totally different types of player.
They are, but that in itself isn't relevant. You could buy a striker, with a keeper moving the other way as part of the deal. The main reason that these suggestions are laughable, is the assumption that Murray would agree to signing for them anyway.