- Oct 17, 2008
- 14,563
His comments as reported by the BBC from his parole hearing are telling.
It's not fair at all and the reason I WOULD say the same for all murderers who get 'life'.Don't entirely disagree, but you could say the same for all murderers who get 'life' sentences. The average murderer spends just 16 and a half years inside.
How fair is that?
How stupid are you? I never said a preference.Well f*** you (swear filter probsbly cutting in) but if you'd prefer to have a body-building **** who lives to hurt people (and who the police will do their damndest to avoid dealing with) living next door to you than me, you must be the stupidest **** on NSC.
..... or are you his dear old mum? Bless...............
It is. But put in perspective he has already done more porridge than the Great Train Robbers - and significantly longer than the serial paedophile Paul Gadd. I would trust Bronson not to harm my grandchild. I couldn't say the same of Gadd.By all accounts, including his own, he was a violent little shit long before getting banged up for robbing a post office. Obviously it's speculation now but I would think he would have ended up in prison for some violent crime or other before long. Well, threatening post office counter staff with a sawn off shotgun is a fairly violent act in it's own right.
He’s been released twice previously. Both times he was arrested and back inside within a couple of months.He's had 7 previous parole hearings.
He should've used his noddle, behaved himself, and he might've been out already.
As I said earlier, he's obviously not quite the full ticket and has done himself no favours.
I agree he has been mistreated inside prison. I’m not sure I’d go as far as to say I’d trust him.It is. But put in perspective he has already done more porridge than the Great Train Robbers - and significantly longer than the serial paedophile Paul Gadd. I would trust Bronson not to harm my grandchild. I couldn't say the same of Gadd.
Bronson attacked members of the prison establishment - and there is no doubt they mistreated him - and he targeted paedos in prison (as many convicted criminals do and I can't say that is a bad thing).
In answer to Lenny's question, I would go for a coffee with him and discuss his art. I'll go first as I'm totally convinced that he presents absolutely no danger to me. If I'm wrong, you can do a whip for a floral tribute!
He deserves his chance. 12 months in an open nick and if he behaves, let him out on a life licence.
Indeed they are. As are his comments in the documentary.His comments as reported by the BBC from his parole hearing are telling.
The worry is his own, completely understandable, paranoia. He gave an account about this on his first release.It is. But put in perspective he has already done more porridge than the Great Train Robbers - and significantly longer than the serial paedophile Paul Gadd. I would trust Bronson not to harm my grandchild. I couldn't say the same of Gadd.
Bronson attacked members of the prison establishment - and there is no doubt they mistreated him - and he targeted paedos in prison (as many convicted criminals do and I can't say that is a bad thing).
In answer to Lenny's question, I would go for a coffee with him and discuss his art. I'll go first as I'm totally convinced that he presents absolutely no danger to me. If I'm wrong, you can do a whip for a floral tribute!
He deserves his chance. 12 months in an open nick and if he behaves, let him out on a life licence.
I don't think that's the case. From the documentary, he has been downgraded to a 'medium risk' prisoner. So he almost certainly isn't any longer experiencing the conditions you describe.If he is still on a six man unlock in riot gear then who the hell would be brave enough to sign his release papers.
I haven’t yet seen the documentary that’s why I said if. I do know that given his previous antics he was on a six man unlock every time his door was opened that happened for years. That takes a lot of resources as well as being a pain in the ass for staff. However I would like to think he is a changed man given his age but I’m not to sure about that.I don't think that's the case. From the documentary, he has been downgraded to a 'medium risk' prisoner. So he almost certainly isn't any longer experiencing the conditions you describe.
Apparently he’s refused to do an official dna test and you can’t get dna from two moustache hairs (not sure about that but it was on the internet so must be true).I thought his son was genuine?
DNA tests and all that?
Apparently he’s refused to do an official dna test and you can’t get dna from two moustache hairs (not sure about that but it was on the internet so must be true).
Also, he is a horrible paparazzi who likes the fame himself and even set up a museum for him . Here is a short documentary on the bloke
So I’m calling bollocks.