D
Deleted member 18477
Guest
Like i have said before if i was a bt shareholder i would be very worried, this is going to end in tears.
Why? I'd say things look pretty strong for BT shareholders.
Like i have said before if i was a bt shareholder i would be very worried, this is going to end in tears.
So one weak group stage game per British team. That's all they have to do to honour the commitment.
Honestly, why would they do that?
As I said before FTA games are a chance to massively promote the subscription service AND pull in £££ from advertisers.
Under the existing model both Sky and ITV make money out of the Champions League but in different ways. From 2015, BT will make money out of it in different ways too.
(As for BT shareholders being worried about the outlay on sports rights, I think they were more worried about losing 20,000 broadband subscribers to Sky each month - or whatever it was)
this, never watch the matches - used to watch the occasional UEFA/Europa League match but I can do without it fairly easily,No great loss to terrestrial tv as far as I'm concerned. Have so little interest in CL.
If they're going to put their best games free to air, why would people bother to subscribe?
Come on now. They're not going to give away ALL the best games, are they?
Just as ITV don't show all/many of the best games now. (Or both legs of ANY tie)
I never bother until the quarter finalsAccording to the original article, UEFA stipulate that some of the matches must still be free to air.
I think it'd be interesting to see how popular the CL is in this country without the effectively free advertising/hype it gets from ITV, I wonder if most people wouldn't be bothered until the quarter finals.
Why? I'd say things look pretty strong for BT shareholders.
BT are like kids in a sweet shop trying to buy everything in sight at any cost, the money they are spunking on sports rights are ridiculous, £900 for c/l & e/l that is laughable, c/l only represented 3% of viewing on sky. They currently have 2 million subscribers, how many of them are paying subscribers? it's only going to cost the end user more in the long run because the current model of offering the channels free to b/b customers is not sustainable.I don't subscribe to sky.
BT want their share of broadband customers back. That's what they're in this for really. The Live sport is an enticing ploy to do just that - and it works as demonstrated by Sky over the last 5 to 10 years...
I think its great as Murdoch is an utter prick!
Indeed it is and if they have to result to this in order to win back phone and bb customers then it just shows what a crap and over priced product they have,how about this for a radical idea,why not invest all that cash in a more competitive telecommunications product that can stem the flow of customers leaving.
You need more than broadband these days mate... Sport sells. Simple as that.
BT are trying with their roll out of super fast broadband which is a good product. However sky TV is better at the mo and offer a fuller package... So BT had to get involved with more media to compete. Otherwise they would have gone broke in a few years...