[Albion] Champions League 23/24 Thread

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊



Green Cross Code Man

Wunt be druv
Mar 30, 2006
20,748
Eastbourne
Bayern should probably demand a replay. Madrid are so incredibly boring and probably paid the linesman. The woman in the studio, don't know her name said that they have a magic wand. They are cheats there's no magic.
 






Vin

Well-known member
Jun 12, 2021
633
From BBC Sport Pat Nevin - don’t make sense of the below.

I think the linesman got that just about right. I'm not even sure the player he flagged offside was offside. I think they've got it wrong, De Ligt was offside but he wasn't the one that got the ball.
 


kevo

Well-known member
Mar 8, 2008
9,801
From BBC Sport Pat Nevin - don’t make sense of the below.

I think the linesman got that just about right. I'm not even sure the player he flagged offside was offside. I think they've got it wrong, De Ligt was offside but he wasn't the one that got the ball.
What a ****! What is he saying?
 






Pavilionaire

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2003
31,267
I still can't get over those subs. If you were trying to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory you would have done exactly what Tuchel did.

And Harry Kane is so unlucky if he fell in a barrel of tits he'd come up sucking his thumb.
 












Eeyore

Colonel Hee-Haw of Queen's Park
NSC Patron
Apr 5, 2014
25,924
From BBC Sport Pat Nevin - don’t make sense of the below.

I think the linesman got that just about right. I'm not even sure the player he flagged offside was offside. I think they've got it wrong, De Ligt was offside but he wasn't the one that got the ball.
What's the problem ? Makes perfect sense.

The player who was offside was the player who shouldn't have been flagged offside so the linesman didn't flag the correct player offside because he was flagging the wrong player offside.
 








kevo

Well-known member
Mar 8, 2008
9,801
Weird thing about that decision. We're told it can't go to VAR because the ref had already whistled when the lino's flag went up. Yet a few seasons ago, Man Utd were awarded a penalty at the Amex by VAR after the ref had whistled for full-time. Make it make sense.
 










Justice

Dangerous Idiot
Jun 21, 2012
20,679
Born In Shoreham
Weird thing about that decision. We're told it can't go to VAR because the ref had already whistled when the lino's flag went up. Yet a few seasons ago, Man Utd were awarded a penalty at the Amex by VAR after the ref had whistled for full-time. Make it make sense.
The game had continued for a minute or so at City we then had a pen awarded against us. They make this shit up in the PL.
 




Happy Exile

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Apr 19, 2018
2,135
Weird thing about that decision. We're told it can't go to VAR because the ref had already whistled when the lino's flag went up. Yet a few seasons ago, Man Utd were awarded a penalty at the Amex by VAR after the ref had whistled for full-time. Make it make sense.
That's one of the few decisions of recent years that still annoys me. It shouldn't have even been a corner, it should have been a goal kick, and it happened during the time added on that was way more than it should have been. Absolute robbery and then for Man United to go on about showing "character".
 


South Stand Bonfire

Who lit that match then?
NSC Patron
Jan 24, 2009
2,537
Shoreham-a-la-mer
That's one of the few decisions of recent years that still annoys me. It shouldn't have even been a corner, it should have been a goal kick, and it happened during the time added on that was way more than it should have been. Absolute robbery and then for Man United to go on about showing "character".
I remember that. The ref played 4/5 minutes extra time when something like only 3 minutes was added on and there were NO stoppages in the first three minutes of added on time.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top