- Thread starter
- #101
he would be a normal politician in France or Italy having a bit extra on the side he was one of Maggie loyalist surporters. R.I.P
Whoosh.
he would be a normal politician in France or Italy having a bit extra on the side he was one of Maggie loyalist surporters. R.I.P
We also agree on other issues believe it or not, particularly the State of Israel
Too much time on your hands! Go back to your Crystal Ball or Abacus because 2 + 2 does equal 5. If the best you can come up with is asumptions and mind reading than you have lost the argument.
Really? Is that the best you've got? You do look a tad small holding that big spade in such an enormous hole.
I now realise that I was wrong to suggest "either you were being deliberately abstruse, disingenuous, trying to wriggle off the hook or just plain thick"; I should've included "wilfully perverse" and omitted the "either"/"or" pronoun/conjunction construct.
You're just another arrogant, smug, nasty little leftist bigot, Cecil Parkinson was worth 10,000 of you. Unfortunately there are millions like you in this country; fortunately there are even more decent people who'll prevent the terrorist lovers you would like to see take power from ever gaining it.
Really? Is that the best you've got? You do look a tad small holding that big spade in such an enormous hole.
I now realise that I was wrong to suggest "either you were being deliberately abstruse, disingenuous, trying to wriggle off the hook or just plain thick"; I should've included "wilfully perverse" and omitted the "either"/"or" pronoun/conjunction construct.
Parkinson was a scumbag, nothing more, nothing less. To even consider him better than ANYBODY is incredulous.
Try and get it through your head. The politics has nothing to do with the scumbags actions.
Got to be honest I'm losing interest in responding to you because in the real world I would not give you the time of day and if we ever met I promise you you would not be allowed abuse me the way you have. Hide behind your keyboard say what you want to say bebause I really don't care for people like you.
You're just another arrogant, smug, nasty little leftist bigot, Cecil Parkinson was worth 10,000 of you. Unfortunately there are millions like you in this country; fortunately there are even more decent people who'll prevent the terrorist lovers you would like to see take power from ever gaining it.
You're usually a bit more nuanced and thoughtful in your opinions I can think of plenty of people who are worse.
Agree he didn't act properly in relation to his behaviour towards his daughter but surely some of his accomplishments when in government (overseeing 83 election campaign/victory) unquestioningly benefitting millions as well as his (as far as we know) impeccable behaviour to other family members and friends suggests an overall positive opinion of Cecil is at least .. possible.
As a father, I cannnot.
Children are an emotive subject. To treat this child, with all the disadvantages she had been dealt already, the way he did, is in my mind disgusting, and beneath contempt.
A reasonable point but I doubt his other children would appreciate him being pilloried as nothing more than a disgusting scumbag.
Got to be honest I'm losing interest in responding to you because in the real world I would not give you the time of day and if we ever met I promise you you would not be allowed abuse me the way you have. Hide behind your keyboard say what you want to say bebause I really don't care for people like you.
A reasonable point but I doubt his other children would appreciate him being pilloried as nothing more than a disgusting scumbag.
As a father, I cannnot.
Children are an emotive subject. To treat this child, with all the disadvantages she had been dealt already, the way he did, is in my mind disgusting, and beneath contempt.
Thats the price of living in the public eye im afraid.
Plus im sure they benefitted, what with him not having to pay money out of the family funds for his child out of wedlock.
Very true we all form opinions on people in the public eye without really knowing them or the true circumstances instead we just rely on the filtered information we get through the media mingled with our own baggage and preconceptions/bias.
That sounds a bit like guilt by association reasoning possibly in an attempt to invalidate their feelings at this sad time?
Thats the price of living in the public eye im afraid.
Plus im sure they benefitted, what with him not having to pay money out of the family funds for his child out of wedlock.
True, it wasn't him that was the problem, it was his little friend.