deletebeepbeepbeep
Well-known member
- May 12, 2009
- 21,811
Why ?
A number of people are conitnously looking for criticisms of our club and making a big deal out of it like some stupid persocution complex.
Why ?
He sometimes punches when he should catch, but he's a good shot stopper and his distribution is superb. Does't warrent quite a lot of the criticism he gets on here, mainly by the Kuipers worshipers I suspect.
It's this sort of thread that makes me think we are still a small-thinking club.
He is still the weak link in our team.
He is still the weak link in our team.
Such bollocks. Incredible.
Words fail me.
Who statistically has the best defence in the league? And that has NOTHING to do with the qualities of Ankergren?
A number of people are conitnously looking for criticisms of our club and making a big deal out of it like some stupid persocution complex.
I'm probably in the minority when I say I dislike Ankergren's 'technique', but it doesn't mean I think he's a bad keeper.
His time wasting, i.e when he takes ages to take a goal kick, waits for a striker to come to him before picking it up and hoofing it, really is a pain in the arse, especially as he seems to have no boundaries as to when he does it, the worst one I remember was doing it 2 minutes in to our match with Exeter! It wasn't even as though he was simply taking his time to settle any nerves, he actually warranted the referree blowing his whistle to tell him to hurry up.
To be honest, its mostly the defence and the midfield. the way we keep the ball and the way we allow such few shots on goal.ankergren has never had to produce a match winning performance or ever been under heavy pressure for a sustained period of time. just because we concede few goals doesnt mean its all down to casper. we defend well as a team.
Would people please get over this Kuipers thing? I fail to see why people insist on bringing him up whenever criticism of a 'keeper comes up.
We could have an absolute clown in goal who concedes 30 goals a game and people would still think critical opinions were from "Kuipers worshipers".
Ankergren divides opinion, I like him, some don't. Kuipers and opinions of him are irrelevant to this thread.
Although I still hoping and willing to be proved wrong with Barnes!!
Considered that he's actually been instructed to do it ?