- Thread starter
- #241
As explained above, it's not worked out like that.
4 times your personal income is used for you home, because you also have to use your income to pay for everything else in life - council tax, gas/elec, water, food, car, clothes, etc etc. With a rental property, the rental income has to cover the mortgage and it doesn't need to do much more than that. So companies used to ask for rental income to cover 125% of the mortgage, allowing for interest rate rises. The last btl I bought cost 325k, and I got a 275k mortgage for it.
So you put down 50K,and the rent covered the mortagage payments.Sorry but I don't get why they lent you 275K? Is it connected to for example
to how much capital you have in other properties? Otherwise you raised it based on your employment earnings?