We all know more or less how much we got for Leo, so you can bet everybody else does.
FFS.
No, it isn't. Its about keeping other clubs in the dark about the size of our transfer pot.
That's 9%Less the £225,000 which we have to give to Watford as they had a 15% sell on clause.
Ok, let's say that that's exactly why transfer fees are reported as undisclosed, what practical benefit would that provide for the club?What is it about us and undisclosed fees? Is it all about keeping the paying "customers" in the dark?
FFS.
No, it isn't. Its about keeping other clubs in the dark about the size of our transfer pot.
So do all the other clubs not read newspapers or watch sky sports then? As they are all reporting £2.5m.
Maybe we say 'undisclosed' and then pretend that it was only really £500k when we try to buy someone on the cheap! - might work...
That's 9%
What is it about us and undisclosed fees? Is it all about keeping the paying "customers" in the dark?
The % sell on only applies to the profit.
What is it about us and undisclosed fees? Is it all about keeping the paying "customers" in the dark?
What is it about us and undisclosed fees? Is it all about keeping the paying "customers" in the dark?