Skint Gull
New member
Nope, and for me, that was cheating. They knew the ball hadn't crossed the line, so to me, that is completely different and I would have voted guilty on that. They should have said, hang on, there's no way we can accept that because the ball went wide. But they didn't, they rather smugly thought f*** it, 1-0 up.
The difference is that Palace's goal was fair and legal, so Bristol City had the decision to make. The decided not to let Palace score to make up for it, which in my opinion (as I posted earlier) is fine because it was their choice. But Reading didn't score a valid goal, it was a complete mistake by the officials and they should have owned up to it.
I have read that several times, and I am now convinved it makes no sense at all.
I was gonna say exactly the same thing. Both teams knew what they'd done was wrong so to say the 2 events are different is crazy. To be honest I don't think it's right but i don't expect any time to give up a goal when things like this happen in the future.