portlock seagull
Well-known member
- Jul 28, 2003
- 17,763
Why was this moved from main board? Purely curious!
Why was this moved from main board? Purely curious!
I would guess its just not the perfect time to discuss how little a life is or isnt worth.
OMG, hope not getting five from 2+2?
I don't know how I would feel if a loved one was murdered. The tax paid to upkeep these scum also annoys me. Overall however, for reasons already mentioned I am against it.
It was once suggested that the cost of the appeals process upon sentence of death was higher than keeping them incarcerated.
As of October 2018 the cost of keeping the likes of Sutcliffe going at HMP Frankland was £172 per day or £63,000 per year. Not value for money imho.
Another Timothy Evans or Derek Bentley is another one too many.
Wasn't Evans hung on the evidence of the murderer himself ?
It can seem tempting at times, but I wouldn’t bring it back. Mistakes have been made in the past and will continue to be made.
Given modern forensics, if they can prove a case without any shadow of a doubt and the crime is so sickening it deserves nothing less, than I think we should!
If there is the slightest possibility of a mistake, then no. The faintest hint of a doubt? Absolutely NO!
But Ian Brady, Roy Whiting, Ian Huntley, Fred West, Peter Sutcliffe, Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale (the two scumbags who publicly hackied Lee Rigby to death) for example ..... any doubts? Anybody?
Nope.
The average death row wait in the US is 15 years. The costs of trials, appeals, petitions etc. is far in excess of a normal trial for life imprisonment.
In Florida alone, it costs the taxpayer $51m more per year to fund death row rather than incarcerate inmates for life without parole. On average across the US a death row inmate costs $1.12m each than a life without parole inmate.
I'm quite happy for the above to die a long drawn out existence at her majesty's pleasure at less expense to the taxpayer.
regards
DF