Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Bring back fox hunting...



HampshireSeagulls

Moulding Generation Z
Jul 19, 2005
5,264
Bedford
sgreenfield04 said:
LETS NOT.:angry:

Got a real reason, or just another class warrior who doesn't like it it because you think that "toffs" do it?

If you are basing your opinion on hunting on horseback, then I'll agree with you based on the redundancy of the method. However, I will still maintain that the most effective way of killing countryside pests is poisoning, trapping or shooting. Not pretty, but a pretty class-free way of killing.
 




Fred Oliver - Legend

Well-known member
Jul 20, 2005
3,769
Valley Park
Fox hunting on horse back. It is a cruel, painfull, scary death for the foxs.period.

I have been against it for years had have close friends that have campaigned against it heavly.

I also agree that countryside pests do need to be controled, but in a less horific manor.
 




sgreenfield04 said:
Fox hunting on horse back. It is a cruel, painfull, scary death for the foxs.period.

I have been against it for years had have close friends that have campaigned against it heavly.

I also agree that countryside pests do need to be controled, but in a less horific manor.

Why?

What is the definition of a pest?

When is a pest not a pest?

Should the controlling of "pests" be for economic, social or just plain sport?

LC
 


Dave the OAP

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
46,761
at home
bhafc4eva said:
Whats are weapons of choice then? Im going to go for the good old fashioned bow and arrow as i belive it may be hard to catch up with a fox and club it to death. Also that Elm Grove can really take it out of you.


ak-47 and a pea shooter.
 




Dave the OAP

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
46,761
at home
funny you should say that though....mrs DTG and I both remarked how many are dead at the side of the roads these days.
 




HampshireSeagulls

Moulding Generation Z
Jul 19, 2005
5,264
Bedford
Less than 5% of the foxes chased are ever even caught. Riding the hounds after foxes is the most ineffective way of pest control. It should, however, have been retained as a spectacle, but under drag or human guidelines instead.

Personally, we used to use to free running snares - hold them overnight, shoot them in the mornings. That is, the ones who didn't chew their legs off to get away, or get attacked and killed by other foxes. It would be better to poison them, but that's illegal now as well, as are spring traps, or hole filling. They have been overprotected because people are more focused on the "hoorays" chasing them on horseback than the problems of weil's disease (yep, not just rats), toxacariosis, mange, etc. And that's ignoring the naturally predatory nature of foxes to take and kill animals. We should be the natural predator of the fox, but that has been taken away through ill-informed legislation.
 




Grendel

New member
Jul 28, 2005
3,251
Seaford
HampshireSeagulls said:
Less than 5% of the foxes chased are ever even caught. Riding the hounds after foxes is the most ineffective way of pest control.

Case in point - the local hunt round here caught 3 foxes last year. A local famer estimates that he shot upwards of 100 in the same period.
 


Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
62,701
The Fatherland
It's the sort of drivel the Argus normally prints.
 


HampshireSeagulls

Moulding Generation Z
Jul 19, 2005
5,264
Bedford
Tubthumper said:
It's the sort of drivel the Argus normally prints.

What is? Which strand do you consider worthy of the Arsegas? And is that selected drivel (ie bits you don't agree with) when compared to the Argus trying their best to stop LDC blocking Falmer?
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here