Don't forget Forster is 35.Yes, I like him too, but do you not think he's a bit similar to Forster? So when Forster is back, where will Joe fit in?
Don't forget Forster is 35.Yes, I like him too, but do you not think he's a bit similar to Forster? So when Forster is back, where will Joe fit in?
So f***ing predictable, oh I know, lets leave a fully fit striker on the bench so we can play Virgo.
It was a stroke of luck in terms of winning the game, because it got our best player on the pitch and he went on to score two and set up two. Would Virgo have done that? No, no chance. That's not a criticism of Virgo, because he's not a striker so I don't expect him to score twice and set up two more, but simply to win the game it DID help us.
If you read that as me being PLEASED he's injured, then you are a moron.
yes, I did read that as you being pleased. Perhaps you want to call me a moron to my face, instead of being a keyboard warrior...
You were the one that started the name calling by branding him a tosser.
Calm down mate.I know where you are coming from with reguarding keyboard warriors but just enjoy our two decent wins lately.
yes, I did read that as you being pleased. Perhaps you want to call me a moron to my face, instead of being a keyboard warrior...
Yes, I like him too, but do you not think he's a bit similar to Forster? So when Forster is back, where will Joe fit in?
A tough guy obviously.
Yep, and I know he won't play every game, but Forster is QUALITY and when fit will have to play.
what we are bordering have a squad set up here............backup as good as the starting 11