The City Council has said it needs 16-20,000 new homes, but has only identified enough sites for 11,500.
Frank Gehry tower blocks are the answer; but it will never happen.
The City Council has said it needs 16-20,000 new homes, but has only identified enough sites for 11,500.
How the heck are kids born here supposed to be able to stay here?
I'm 25, I live and work in Brighton.
I'm on a half-decent wage (for my age) and I'm saving up for a deposit for a mortgage...
...to buy in Gloucestershire.
I couldn't afford to pay a mortgage (in Brighton) now and to be honest, I don't want to be struggling each month down in Brighton when I could have a much more affordable house in the Cotswolds.
How the heck are kids born here supposed to be able to stay here?
Where did you get this little nugget of information,......?
It's work in tourism or nothing. Plus the tourism, with its celebrity chefs and second home owning Londoners also drives the house prices up.
Census information says household income in Brighton is just below the national average.
The City Council has said it needs 16-20,000 new homes, but has only identified enough sites for 11,500.
There are thousands going in down the Marina.Where are the main sites for the 11,500? I can only think of Mile Oak as a possibility.
Where EXACTLY are these 16,000 + people living NOW?
It needs a radical approach, a sea change in thinking, to make that sort of development happen. Sadly I doubt our 'politicians' are up to the challenge.
Frank Gehry tower blocks are the answer; but it will never happen.
This is all part of an long running trend, and is what happens when housing policy merely encourages market forces. One policy that would have a real effect would be a land value tax, which will act as a disincentive/exorbitant cost for over popular sites (rates on Oxford Street in London, or Churchill Square in Brighton, for instance, would rise substantially), and act as an incentive for people to move into those un- and under-occupied housing that litter so many parts of the country -- mainly those de-industrialised areas. A Land Value Tax has long been a Green Party policy, so Westdene Seagull will no doubt think it's a dreadful idea, but Labour are increasingly warming to the idea under Miliband, and I wouldn't be surprised if they put it into their forthcoming election manifesto.
Brighton is 2nd to London in new business start ups in the UK.
Working for someone else & being told what to do for low money is so last century
Surprised it's that far down the list TBH.
But not EVERYONE can own a business. You need workers to work in it. This is where the enterprise led vision of everyone from the government to Aldridge academies falls down. Start ups are not profitable for three years or more in general and are hardly likely to be paying a big salary to either their founder or their very small number of staff. Besides there are start ups in Cornwall - they're called "seafood restaurants"
Build more houses? but where??
So the labourer/mower man that came down from from Wolves last summer and now works for 6 people I know for a tenner an hour is unique? And our cleaner who put an ad in the corner shop window?
No corporations for the New Wave Sons