- Oct 17, 2008
- 14,471
He does but looking young does not a poor player make. We haven’t tried him enough. We got better as the half goes on but it was objectively a poor half for our standardsHe has but he sure looks young
He does but looking young does not a poor player make. We haven’t tried him enough. We got better as the half goes on but it was objectively a poor half for our standardsHe has but he sure looks young
Disagree. I thought it was an excellent strike.Poor keeping for our goal IMO.
Very astute observation.Not the best half, but not bad, I’m at the Amex, and that 1st half went flying by for me. We normally do better in the 2nd half so here’s to more goals for the good guys!
Solly, of course.At least we now know who's going to score the winner.
I think it’s that he doesn’t want to give a red card. It was a bad decision.The sort of decision where you think the only explanation is bribery, because surely no one can be THAT incompetent
It was, doesn't mean that the keeper shouldn't have done better with it.Disagree. I thought it was an excellent strike.
Can't wait for half past Mitoma!It's March 15th and our March scored in the 15th minute..lol
Twice? Really? After the initial yellow? Well dodgy....I think it’s that he doesn’t want to give a red card. It was a bad decision.
I have seen it quite a few times and I don’t agree but respect your opinion.It was, doesn't mean that the keeper shouldn't have done better with it.
Yes - but he had a chance to put it right straight after!I think it’s that he doesn’t want to give a red card. It was a bad decision.
I personally think it’s spineless rather than “dodgy” implying dishonesty. It was a second yellow clear as day, but he bottled it on his own without interference.Twice? Really? After the initial yellow? Well dodgy....