https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/36810558?client=safari#
Low cost gone - blaming Brexit
Low cost gone - blaming Brexit
...it was an election manifesto pledge of the party that won an outright majority...
You just don't like democracy, do you?
It's not that people don't like democracy. For me, it should never have been promised or delivered. If we held a referendum to see if everyone wanted to retire at 40 on a full state pension, It' likely get voted in. It eould be democracy. But the country would be bankrupt within 2 years.
Would it have been ok if a party had their policy of withdrawing from the EU, and then they were voted in with a majority? i.e. is it just the idea of the referendum you don't like?It's not that people don't like democracy. For me, it should never have been promised or delivered. If we held a referendum to see if everyone wanted to retire at 40 on a full state pension, It' likely get voted in. It eould be democracy. But the country would be bankrupt within 2 years.
Would it have been ok if a party had their policy of withdrawing from the EU, and then they were voted in with a majority? i.e. is it just the idea of the referendum you don't like?
Sorry if I offended but seriously! Davies is in charge of Brexit and Fox is in charge of international trade. If you think that Boris might possibly be in favour of free movement and that it will make any difference you are fooling yourself.
If you think Boris really is against the principle of free movement then I think you are wrong, but as to it making any difference then I tend to think you are right. I raised it as a possibility, that's all. Sorry for being foolish.
I agree with that, I just wondered if your issue was with the idea of referendums at all.A policy? That is a stretch. they promised a referendum to lure UKIP voters in. They carried it through to appease back benchers.
12-24 months to hash out trade deals with America, China and other 'favoured trading partners'? Am I understanding this correctly
If you think Boris really is against the principle of free movement then I think you are wrong, but as to it making any difference then I tend to think you are right. I raised it as a possibility, that's all. Sorry for being foolish.
Article here from yesterdays Telegraph on free movement, pointing out its sacrosanct status to the EU - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...sely-emotional-about-free-movement-they-wont/
Yes, that is what you're meant to believe. Impressive eh? Especially as it is apparently illegal under the terms of the treaty to enter into trade negotiations until the two year process of Article 50 has finished. Davis is apparently intending to ignore this. Hell, what's a treaty obligation to a country like Great Britain?
The foolishness was understandable for the first week or so after the referendum but since then every statement from every politician likely to be involved in the process has been fairly adamant that free movement must go.
When Remainers said it would be very difficult to retain full access to the single market without conceding on free movement Brexiters said they were scaremongering. When this turns out to be true Brexiters will say what revengeful bustards the EU negotiators are proven to be. Win, win.
You would love it to be illegal wouldn't you? Just admit that you are desperate for the UK to fail outside your beloved EU.Yes, that is what you're meant to believe. Impressive eh? Especially as it is apparently illegal under the terms of the treaty to enter into trade negotiations until the two year process of Article 50 has finished. Davis is apparently intending to ignore this. Hell, what's a treaty obligation to a country like Great Britain?
The foolishness was understandable for the first week or so after the referendum but since then every statement from every politician likely to be involved in the process has been fairly adamant that free movement must go.
What are they going to do to us if he starts negotiations with others? Kick us out or just cancel our rebate?
Historically the UK has been rather keen on international law but I guess times change.
Please back up your claim with more than words.Historically the UK has been rather keen on international law but I guess times change.