Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] Brexit

If there was a second Brexit referendum how would you vote?


  • Total voters
    1,111










nicko31

Well-known member
Jan 7, 2010
18,709
Gods country fortnightly


nicko31

Well-known member
Jan 7, 2010
18,709
Gods country fortnightly
At last... a sensible conversation about the iniquities of Brexit


That was a pretty pragmatic discussion. Take guts to admit his decision was driven by historic inner prejudices.
 






Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
56,719
Faversham
Yeah, there has been pretty much no good news of Brexit benefits.


And no prospect of there being any. No indications at all.

So the country needs to step back, air and echo the problems, and encourage visionary! politicians to step up and fix the issues.
Unfortunately there is a large swathe of 'middle England' who were never bothered about the EU, not in favour of leaving, never persuaded by all the (false) promises, who voted remain, and yet are now in the 'the nation decided and now we must move on' camp.

A strange, hesitant, trusting mass of fools, who accept that the referendum was fair and binding and, like death, something that cannot be undone.

Only when they become receptive to the idea that we must create a 'single market type trade deal with the EU' will there be any movement over Brexit. Such a deal is absolutely anathema to the ERG, and any government that pursues it will be accused of 'betraying the will of the people'.

One can understand why Starmer is keeping his powder dry. He is not yet PM and this is not yet his fight. A couple more years of no benefits and continued problems may start to shift the landscape a bit. But all the while that reasonably sensible people are continuing to blame our financial ills on Covid and the war with Ukraine, nothing will change, and any political party that suggests we should probably Do Something will be ridiculed.
 


rogersix

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2014
8,231
Sell a story, tell them about the good stuff, don’t talk about any bad stuff, manage to get away with it and then, after the vote, let them find the truth and what the new rules are. FIFA, Tories, all the bloody same.
:thumbsup: exactly the same philosophy
 






WATFORD zero

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 10, 2003
27,946
Unfortunately there is a large swathe of 'middle England' who were never bothered about the EU, not in favour of leaving, never persuaded by all the (false) promises, who voted remain, and yet are now in the 'the nation decided and now we must move on' camp.

A strange, hesitant, trusting mass of fools, who accept that the referendum was fair and binding and, like death, something that cannot be undone.

Only when they become receptive to the idea that we must create a 'single market type trade deal with the EU' will there be any movement over Brexit. Such a deal is absolutely anathema to the ERG, and any government that pursues it will be accused of 'betraying the will of the people'.

One can understand why Starmer is keeping his powder dry. He is not yet PM and this is not yet his fight. A couple more years of no benefits and continued problems may start to shift the landscape a bit. But all the while that reasonably sensible people are continuing to blame our financial ills on Covid and the war with Ukraine, nothing will change, and any political party that suggests we should probably Do Something will be ridiculed.

I believe we are only just starting to see the 'cost of living' crisis seriously impacting with Electricity and Gas going up less than a month ago, raging inflation showing no sign of lessening and what some experts have described as 'our longest and deepest recession' just beginning. Add in house prices falling, negative equity and repossessions and it is going to get seriously bad over the next couple of years.

The financial cost of Covid is proportionally disappearing (already less than half that of Brexit and getting relatively smaller by the hour). Hopefully a positive outcome to Ukraine, and the underlying economic situations of all nations will become clearer.

And we haven't even been out of the EU's single market for two years yet and the opinion polls are already showing the majority of people thinking Brexit was a mistake :facepalm:

Another 2 years of a hugely worsening situation may make that 'strange, hesitant, trusting mass of fools' (I, of course wouldn't use that terminology :wink:) think again that maybe, just maybe, something really does need to be done because Britain will look very different in 2024 ???

Just to be clear, I'm not talking Sunlit Uplands :lolol:
 


sparkie

Well-known member
Jul 17, 2003
13,322
Hove
Unfortunately there is a large swathe of 'middle England' who were never bothered about the EU, not in favour of leaving, never persuaded by all the (false) promises, who voted remain, and yet are now in the 'the nation decided and now we must move on' camp.

A strange, hesitant, trusting mass of fools, who accept that the referendum was fair and binding and, like death, something that cannot be undone.

Only when they become receptive to the idea that we must create a 'single market type trade deal with the EU' will there be any movement over Brexit. Such a deal is absolutely anathema to the ERG, and any government that pursues it will be accused of 'betraying the will of the people'.

One can understand why Starmer is keeping his powder dry. He is not yet PM and this is not yet his fight. A couple more years of no benefits and continued problems may start to shift the landscape a bit. But all the while that reasonably sensible people are continuing to blame our financial ills on Covid and the war with Ukraine, nothing will change, and any political party that suggests we should probably Do Something will be ridiculed.

The rigmarole of ETIAS waivers kicking in in Nov 2023, roaming charges, and the slow, slow lane at airports should cause a drip drip drip of grumbling.

Hopefully the little annoyances will mount up and one day soon a general epiphany will break out that we need the solutions and the visionaries to deliver them.
 




rogersix

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2014
8,231
Yeah, there has been pretty much no good news of Brexit benefits.


And no prospect of there being any. No indications at all.

So the country needs to step back, air and echo the problems, and encourage visionary! politicians to step up and fix the issues.
starmer can't do the obvious thing until the hard of learning realise what they've done. so 2028/9 is the earliest any manifesto will mention rejoining, so 2030 we'll be in the single market and customs union. it's gonna be a long wait, and a very expensive fubar, ah well, c'est la vie!
 


Blues Guitarist

Well-known member
Oct 19, 2020
618
St Johann in Tirol
What a mess.
The UK Government is not - and never was - interested in controlling immigration. As an EU member the UK failed to take action it could have to reduce immigration. Brexit has got rid of EU citizens that were staffing our hospitals and paying tax, but immigration continues to grow.
 


jcdenton08

Offended Liver Sausage
NSC Patron
Oct 17, 2008
15,023
The UK Government is not - and never was - interested in controlling immigration. As an EU member the UK failed to take action it could have to reduce immigration. Brexit has got rid of EU citizens that were staffing our hospitals and paying tax, but immigration continues to grow.
Well, pre 1997 it was.
 




dsr-burnley

Well-known member
Aug 15, 2014
2,687
The financial cost of Covid is proportionally disappearing (already less than half that of Brexit and getting relatively smaller by the hour). Hopefully a positive outcome to Ukraine, and the underlying economic situations of all nations will become clearer.
Have you got links for that? The reason I ask is that covid costs appear to be around the £400 billion mark, while total exports to the EU were £293 billion in 2019, so what you're saying is that the cost of Brexit is something like 3 times the total exports pre-Brexit. That seems impossible. So if you have a link, I would like to see how the figures are worked out.

 




rogersix

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2014
8,231
would you like a straw with that?
Have you got links for that? The reason I ask is that covid costs appear to be around the £400 billion mark, while total exports to the EU were £293 billion in 2019, so what you're saying is that the cost of Brexit is something like 3 times the total exports pre-Brexit. That seems impossible. So if you have a link, I would like to see how the figures are worked out.

 


dsr-burnley

Well-known member
Aug 15, 2014
2,687
The rigmarole of ETIAS waivers kicking in in Nov 2023, roaming charges, and the slow, slow lane at airports should cause a drip drip drip of grumbling.

Hopefully the little annoyances will mount up and one day soon a general epiphany will break out that we need the solutions and the visionaries to deliver them.
I doubt that. Are there any massed ranks of people demanding political union with the USA because of ESTAs, queues at airports, and more expensive mobile phones?

You'll probably find more grumbling is directed at the people who are charging the money and failing to work the customs offices. To you, it's self evident that if the EU puts in customs barriers, we must join the EU; to some people, the EU's barriers are a knock against the EU, not against the UK.

And for the record, I don't see it as an annoyance that I don't have to pay extra for my mobile phone to subsidize those who use theirs abroad.
 




jcdenton08

Offended Liver Sausage
NSC Patron
Oct 17, 2008
15,023
What action did the Government take to curtail immigration from the EU? (I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm genuinely interested to know)
Oh, none whatsoever. They just pushed Brexit as “the alternative”. I’m just saying mass immigration was a Blairite policy, the numbers skyrocket thereafter. Not making a point either way, just a statement of fact.
 


rogersix

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2014
8,231
Oh, none whatsoever. They just pushed Brexit as “the alternative”. I’m just saying mass immigration was a Blairite policy, the numbers skyrocket thereafter. Not making a point either way, just a statement of fact.
The quicker a economy expands, the more workers it requires
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here