[Politics] Brexit

[Lever]

You up for going back in then?

If not, why not?

 

[Is it PotG?]

If not, why not?

You want to go back in then?

Y/N.

 

[Motogull]

You up for going back in then?

Possibly. I'd rather something that would not fukk the NI/ROI and M20 up done first.

 

[Lever]

You want to go back in then?

Y/N.

I want whatever is economically best for the majority of people in this country; this particular form of Brexit does not provide that. Now..... what do you want?

 

[Is it PotG?]

I want what is materially best for the majority of people in this country; this particular form of Brexit does not provide that. Now..... what do you want?

You want to change a democratic referendum result because you believe it will be better for others?

I wish I could change a lot of things in others interests.

 

[Lever]

You want to change a democratic referendum result because you believe it will be better for others?

I wish I could change a lot of things in others interests.

No.... let's try again.
The referendum never stipulated which particular form of Brexit was on offer; it was just in/out. It is now clear that some Brexit terms are better than others.

We cannot turn back the clock even though there was a lot of disinformation in 2016 (on both sides); but within the Brexit options there are some more preferable than others and this one is very, very poor.

However dogma amongst the Brexit ultras refuses to allow any modifications.

If you want to change things in other people's interests you could acknowledge some basic changes to the arrangements need to be made. But I am not expecting the cult of Brexit will allow you to do that.....

 

[Lever]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2a_q7A04jY

 

[Lever]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wqupn1SJxeE

 

[vegster]

Struggling to find New Potatoes at the moment ? Is there something kind of problem ?

Usually it's the Egyptian spuds harvested first, then Cyprus , then Spanish/French and then Jersey Royals and finally Cornish... we should be at the Spanish stage by now surely ?

 

[Dick Swiveller]

Struggling to find New Potatoes at the moment ? Is there something kind of problem ?

Usually it's the Egyptian spuds harvested first, then Cyprus , then Spanish/French and then Jersey Royals and finally Cornish... we should be at the Spanish stage by now surely ?

Tried Rwanda? That would be my guess.

 

[kevo]

David Davies claiming the reason Brexit has failed is because we got a 'remainers Brexit'.

These people are now beginning to sound insane. They negotiated for the hardest possible Brexit and told everyone it was a grest deal. And now they're blaming remainers? Utterly risible.

 

[vegster]

David Davies claiming the reason Brexit has failed is because we got a 'remainers Brexit'.

These people are now beginning to sound insane. They negotiated for the hardest possible Brexit and told everyone it was a grest deal. And now they're blaming remainers? Utterly risible.

They have to somehow keep all the plates spinning and its getting harder and harder to do. The first small rumblings of discontent are slowly coming out.

Looking forward to the new NI Protocol policy and wondering if suddenly they have discovered some kind of Shrodinger's Cat solution that can possibly create a trade border without a physical border.

 

[Pretty Plnk Fairy]

So what is arron Banks was being paid by russia over brexit, they've never done anything wrong before or after, just goes to show that ramoners are racialists

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/jun/13/arron-banks-loses-libel-action-against-reporter-carole-cadwalladr-guardian-defamation-brexit-russia

 

[Blue Valkyrie]

David Davies claiming the reason Brexit has failed is because we got a 'remainers Brexit'.

These people are now beginning to sound insane. They negotiated for the hardest possible Brexit and told everyone it was a grest deal. And now they're blaming remainers? Utterly risible.

Blimey.

They've resorted to the *thick as mince* gambit already.

Lol.

 

[Thunder Bolt]

Carole Cadwalladr has won against Aaron Banks's effort to sue her for libel. It is a triumph for investigative journalism.

[tweet]1536279013450186752[/tweet]

 

[Blue Valkyrie]

Carole Cadwalladr has won against Aaron Banks's effort to sue her for libel. It is a triumph for investigative journalism.

[tweet]1536279013450186752[/tweet]

Good stuff.

That poor woman has gone through so much stress just for trying to inform the nation.

 

[Lever]

Carole Cadwalladr has won against Aaron Banks's effort to sue her for libel. It is a triumph for investigative journalism.

[tweet]1536279013450186752[/tweet]

Sometimes justice prevails!

 

[Blue3]

Meanwhile in the rest of the world

Russia and China have opened the first Bridge between the two countries connecting the two nations super highways, enabling faster frictionless trade.

 

[cunning fergus]

Carole Cadwalladr has won against Aaron Banks's effort to sue her for libel. It is a triumph for investigative journalism.

[tweet]1536279013450186752[/tweet]

Hardly, the ruling means that whilst there was no evidence to support Cadwallers claims of Russian interference, (a point the judge held up) the claims did not defame Banks because the allegations would only have been consumed by people in Cadwhallers “echo chamber”……..and therefore that group held a low opinion of Banks already.

In a nutshell…….unsubstantiated lies being made public in the press is hardly a triumph of investigative journalism.

 

[nicko31]

Carole Cadwalladr has won against Aaron Banks's effort to sue her for libel. It is a triumph for investigative journalism.

[tweet]1536279013450186752[/tweet]

A victory for free speech, we can't have journalists being supressed by the rich and powerful