[Politics] Brexit

[JC Footy Genius]

which in a nutshell is damage limitation again.

So the people who merely hold the government / leave campaign to account on Brexit promises made, issues / problems which were identified and dismissed as project fear which became reality and all the things Brexiteers said / believed which were debunked and / or did not materialise makes you radicalised.....

Sorry but if you're one of those who ignores the evidence of their eyes and ears and buys into the alternative reality, that is the definition of radicalised

Which, in a nutshell, was a generally positive and optimistic report which is why you made a series of moronic statements claiming it was a tax funded pro Brexit report.

For radicalised see setting up an account on a football forum for the sole purpose of continually spouting ill informed bollox about politics ...

 

[WATFORD zero]

Which, in a nutshell, was a generally positive and optimistic report which is why you made a series of moronic statements claiming it was a tax funded pro Brexit report.

For radicalised see setting up an account on a football forum for the sole purpose of continually spouting ill informed bollox about politics ...

Well, obviously not everyone can be as well informed about politics as an ex junior assistant administrator on a politics forum

Far be it from me to advise one so well informed, but try reading an article beyond the headline before posting a link to it so others can read the detail

 

[Lever]

Which, in a nutshell, was a generally positive and optimistic report which is why you made a series of moronic statements claiming it was a tax funded pro Brexit report.

For radicalised see setting up an account on a football forum for the sole purpose of continually spouting ill informed bollox about politics ...

or to help you with your issues ...https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-prejudice-2795476

 

[Randy McNob]

Which, in a nutshell, was a generally positive and optimistic report which is why you made a series of moronic statements claiming it was a tax funded pro Brexit report.

For radicalised see setting up an account on a football forum for the sole purpose of continually spouting ill informed bollox about politics ...

If the government give money to Deloitte or any other company - that's taxpayer money

 

[WATFORD zero]

[Tweet]1382636461934194690[/tweet]

 

[Randy McNob]

[Tweet]1382636461934194690[/tweet]

Deloitte produces report on harm from rake not being quite as painfull as first thought....(as a rake benefit)

 

[Chicken Run]

For radicalised see setting up an account on a football forum for the sole purpose of continually spouting ill informed bollox about politics ...

Totally this, I can live with Watford Zero, at least he’s a fan, but this charlatan can do one, ignorant freak!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

 

[Baldseagull]

If you don't mind, I will stick with the interpretation of the professional, independent organisation that actually produced the survey rather than some radicalised Europhile on a football forum. [emoji106]

Sent from my SM-G970F using Tapatalk

Deloitte, has strong links with the Tory Party. All the big Accountancy firms make donations by way of staff secondment to the 3 main parties, but Deloitte is unique in that it makes the vast majority of it's donations to the Tories, whether they are in power or opposition. £670,000 of Deloitte's total of £682,911 went to the Tories when Labour was in power, but In the three years to July 2012 Deloitte gave £435,034 in staff costs and consultancy services to the Tories and £13,500 to Labour.

https://powerbase.info/index.php/Deloitte

Deloitte boast of their connections within government when promoting their advice service for companies seeking to win Government contracts.

https://www2.deloitte.com/uk/en/pag.../solutions/government-and-infrastructure.html

Try interpreting the data yourself, as both deloitte and I have a bias, and see if you can draw a sunnier conclusion than Deloitte, or a harsher one than me, and it will give you an indication of which, if either of us, is treating the data honestly.

 

[WATFORD zero]

If you don't mind, I will stick with the interpretation of the professional, independent organisation that actually produced the survey rather than some radicalised Europhile on a football forum. [emoji106]

Sent from my SM-G970F using Tapatalk

I've used Deloitte Audit services at various times to independently audit software products. It makes the products much easier to sell into large organisations and Government departments when they've been stamped as audited by one of the Big 4.

I always thought that me paying them significant amounts of money, and the independent report saying how good my product was, were just happy coincidences

 

[Randy McNob]

Totally this, I can live with Watford Zero, at least he’s a fan, but this charlatan can do one, ignorant freak!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

welcome back.....

 

[Randy McNob]

Deloitte, has strong links with the Tory Party. All the big Accountancy firms make donations by way of staff secondment to the 3 main parties, but Deloitte is unique in that it makes the vast majority of it's donations to the Tories, whether they are in power or opposition. £670,000 of Deloitte's total of £682,911 went to the Tories when Labour was in power, but In the three years to July 2012 Deloitte gave £435,034 in staff costs and consultancy services to the Tories and £13,500 to Labour.

https://powerbase.info/index.php/Deloitte

Deloitte boast of their connections within government when promoting their advice service for companies seeking to win Government contracts.

https://www2.deloitte.com/uk/en/pag.../solutions/government-and-infrastructure.html

Try interpreting the data yourself, as both deloitte and I have a bias, and see if you can draw a sunnier conclusion than Deloitte, or a harsher one than me, and it will give you an indication of which, if either of us, is treating the data honestly.

I did try and point this out but it doesn't quite fit the alternative reality on planet Brexit

 

[WATFORD zero]

welcome back.....

Totally this, I can live with Watford Zero, at least he’s a fan, but this charlatan can do one, ignorant freak!

He didn't start diving into threads incapable of contributing anything but insults and get himself banned again, did he

 

[Baker lite]

Totally this, I can live with Watford Zero, at least he’s a fan, but this charlatan can do one, ignorant freak!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Watters is a truly horrible back to front,I cannot be having him, the other extremists just amuse me.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[JC Footy Genius]

Totally this, I can live with Watford Zero, at least he’s a fan, but this charlatan can do one, ignorant freak!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

It's quite amusing watching them simultaneously claim the Deloitte quarterly survey is a biased partisan Pro government/Brexit survey while quoting all the sections that highlight the negative past and future sentiment about Brexit.

I've lost count of the number of radicalised remainer accounts set up since the referendum ... Wz finally lost the plot when he had his online paranoia breakdown.

Sent from my SM-G970F using Tapatalk

 

[Baldseagull]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOIqDkxSimg

Thanks for posting this, I had missed this in the news.
Wondering if Pasta and JCFG find themselves siding with the EU on this one, I got the impression that any foreign court making a judgement that would need to be enforced in the UK was a big no no for them.

 

[Baldseagull]

It's quite amusing watching them simultaneously claim the Deloitte quarterly survey is a biased partisan Pro government/Brexit survey while quoting all the sections that highlight the negative past and future sentiment about Brexit.

I've lost count of the number of radicalised remainer accounts set up since the referendum ... Wz finally lost the plot when he had his online paranoia breakdown.

Sent from my SM-G970F using Tapatalk

I don't doubt their data, I question the headline findings that they chose to put in their article, such as "optimism at a six year high" when what they mean is, sharpest 3 month increase in optimism for 6 years. It is surprising that there is not greater increased optimism, you would think only a few companies like any exclusively selling face masks or involved with off-licence only sales would be thinking that reducing the threat of Corona virus and further lock downs was bad for business, I wonder if there is any other factor suppressing optimism for some at the moment?

 

[WATFORD zero]

It's quite amusing watching them simultaneously claim the Deloitte quarterly survey is a biased partisan Pro government/Brexit survey while quoting all the sections that highlight the negative past and future sentiment about Brexit.

I've lost count of the number of radicalised remainer accounts set up since the referendum ... Wz finally lost the plot when he had his online paranoia breakdown.

Sent from my SM-G970F using Tapatalk

The day I finally called you out and we had to sadly say goodbye to that account set up since the referendum [MENTION=35196]Is it PotG?[/MENTION] I remember it well

Luckily that other one set up since the referendum[MENTION=35289]Baker lite[/MENTION] is still here

*edit*

Sorry, I must correct that, it seems Baker lite has taken a little holiday as well

 

[Baldseagull]

It's quite amusing watching them simultaneously claim the Deloitte quarterly survey is a biased partisan Pro government/Brexit survey while quoting all the sections that highlight the negative past and future sentiment about Brexit.

I've lost count of the number of radicalised remainer accounts set up since the referendum ... Wz finally lost the plot when he had his online paranoia breakdown.

Sent from my SM-G970F using Tapatalk

You have heard of "spin" with regard to politics? You seemed to be able to spot that I was able to use the same survey and create different headlines, or as I would describe them, more accurate headlines, from the survey? When I did that, you claimed it was due to me being a radicalised europhile. Whilst I would not agree with that description of me, I will admit a bias towards confirming my position that Brexit is bad for the UK, but you look foolish when you claim Deloitte has no bias.
You posted a link to the article, because the headlines sat nicely with your bias, unfortunately for you, they included a link to the survey data in the article, adding to my "biased" belief that leavers don't often read beyond the headlines, or don't understand what they are reading if they do.

 

[Chicken Run]

welcome back.....

If you’re implying that I’m back from a ban you’re spectacularly WRONG, and don’t waste your time welcoming me back you shit stirring imbecile!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

 

[JC Footy Genius]

Wz is still suffering I see ...