BadFish
Huge Member
- Oct 19, 2003
- 18,198
Bloody general public eh? The next thing you know they'll be voting the Tories into power.
The next choice they have to make is who to lead them through to the promised land. Tough one.
Bloody general public eh? The next thing you know they'll be voting the Tories into power.
I thought this was interesting and supports the OP's argument.
Bloody general public eh? The next thing you know they'll be voting the Tories into power.
The eu wont come offering another deal. But we will have another general election soon and we will elect a pro europe governemtn and will stsy in. Heard it here first
I thought this was interesting and supports the OP's argument.
Rubbish...We called our own bluff and failed, the EU will not be knocking at our door any time soon, we never engaged with Europe or embraced or led, we were never a force for change within, we always haggled, whinged or demanded opt outs, we won't be missed.
24 hours on, and I don't think this is going to happen. There will be some sort of compromise, maybe EU reform; maybe a second vote.
It does seem stupid to invoke a very aggressive piece of political action based on a very marginal majority. Given that the consequent actions of remain is almost nil you could have subsequent referendums to leave, but consequent actions of leave are irrevocable.
You do realise that a mere 30% of the 18-25 group actually bothered to vote. I don't blame them for the result but perhaps it would be helpful to find out why 70% opted out of the process. All this angst from some younger people should be directed towards their peers instead of blaming people at random because democracy didn't go the way those people wanted.
Don't forget 63%, almost 2 out of 3, of the electorate didn't vote for Brexit.
I thought this was interesting and supports the OP's argument.
Realist and you will see....You are deluded sir!
… or was the bar set too low to account for a rounding error?
Would we get the same result in another referendum held just next Thursday?
Should the requirement to change the status quo have been greater- 55%, 60% or whatever?
Is this mandate to quit the EU with all the incredible implications really valid?
You do realise that a mere 30% of the 18-25 group actually bothered to vote. .
Everyone knew that the more fervent supports of whichever side lost the vote would whine on about it for years. Undoubtedly UKIP supporters would have done so if they had lost and this board would be full of the same people who are today complaining laughing at their caricature of those on the other side instead.Spot on EVERYONE had an opportunity to vote they CHOSE not to so no point wondering what would have happened if they did
We manufacture f*ck all. The EU will be fine without us
And [MENTION=11928]vegster[/MENTION] we were voted against 70 times and voted with, thousands. We did alright.
24 hours on, and I don't think this is going to happen. There will be some sort of compromise, maybe EU reform; maybe a second vote.
It does seem stupid to invoke a very aggressive piece of political action based on a very marginal majority. Given that the consequent actions of remain is almost nil you could have subsequent referendums to leave, but consequent actions of leave are irrevocable.