What a bizarre comment from someone who has made 3000 posts, trying to prove her point of view.You don't know what is going to happen any more than I do. Enjoy the point scoring on a football forum.
I know both sides might fall foul of Selective Memory Syndrome but as we totter towards the edge of a cliff largely because of the Irish border issue, I'm trying to recall anyone in the 2016 campaign spending a second yet alone a minute on this. Did no-one see this coming? I can see why the Brexit camp might have been happy for this to escape the radar, but surely someone from the Remain camp might have anticipated such an enormous issue?
You could help Britain by falling in line
regards
DF
The problem is caused by the each side trying to totally vanquish the other completely.
I fully believe that 48%/52% of the vote does not give 100% of the say.
A compromise is the only long term solution.
Leave the EU, re-join EFTA, stay in the CU with paid for single market access until such a time ( 10 years +) as a Switzerland type deal has been negotiated, or we decide to stick with the EEA access arrangement.
Bad losers, bad winners, and 'winner takes all' are the 3 real 'enemies of the people'.
If there is a second ref I actually think you need 2
All the options on the first one
The top 2 on the second.
That way you can actually see what the people want.
Unless I'm mistaken on something (which I could be), this proposed deal is a stroke of genius.
The assumption has always been that you need to come up with something the EU would accept, and let's face it, they won't accept anything which consitutes us really leaving the EU. But there has always been at least some chance of the HoC accepting something, so I assume this deal has been drawn up with the HoC in mind, the EU can be put to one side for a moment.
All Johnson has to do is put this deal to the HoC, and it looks like it would pass. That would have two important effects. 1) The EU can no longer say that the obstacle to a deal is the HoC not agreeing to anything, it nullifies their main excuse and it puts massive pressure on them to accept the deal, but much more importantly, if I'm not mistaken, a vote in the HoC in favor of a deal kills the Benn bill. Johnson will no longer have to write to the EU and ask for an extension.
Which means, come the 20th of October, the pressure will be on the EU to move, since the HoC have finally come to agreement. AND, we will be 11 days from no deal without any prospect of any extension beyond that date.
Checkmate.
if I'm not mistaken, a vote in the HoC in favor of a deal kills the Benn bill. Johnson will no longer have to write to the EU and ask for an extension
What makes you think HoC will back it?
I think you are mistaken as the Benn bill specifically relates to an agreement concluded between the UK and the EU and in your example this wouldn't have happend.
Way to easy otherwise.
"what does it say?"
"Mr Johnson will have until 19 October to either pass a deal in Parliament or get MPs to approve a no-deal Brexit."
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-49580500
As I understand it, it says this right at the top:
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2019/26/enacted/data.htm
You don't know what is going to happen any more than I do. Enjoy the point scoring on a football forum.
OK Nibble i take pity on you for being totally clueless
regards
DF
It is if you're a liberal Democrat , are you ready for Brexit?Why? Britain is not a dictatorship.