Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] Brexit

If there was a second Brexit referendum how would you vote?


  • Total voters
    1,099


schmunk

Why oh why oh why?
Jan 19, 2018
10,338
Mid mid mid Sussex
Jason Groves [MENTION=13823]jason[/MENTION]Groves1
Boris Johnson rules out election pact with Brexit Party. Senior Tory source: ‘Neither Nigel Farage not Arron Banks are fit and proper persons and they should never be allowed anywhere near government’

OK, so he's not entirely useless.
 






clapham_gull

Legacy Fan
Aug 20, 2003
25,876
Tuesday will be interesting, apparently the Scottish appeal was able to see more evidence the UK one.

There is also another potential problem coming his way. Apparently none of the cabinet have seen the legal advice Boris was given before he suspended Parliament.

Unfortunately that breaks the ministerial code which was amended after the Chilcott Enquiry (post Iraq war etc..)

Oh Boris.
 


WATFORD zero

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 10, 2003
27,744
Turn the emotion off, we are in a shit storm that needs level headed leaders, not millennial whiners. Yes there will be victims of Brexit, some exist already. Newspapers with blood on their hands? Do grow up. The issue needs ending, decisively. From a voter and future pensioner of the UK, and a firm remainer. Leave means leave.

After three and a bit years of completely throttling business and the economy, and ensuring the poorest have continued to suffer, I couldn't agree more.

So which decisive ending are you going for ?

1/ The one that will allow business and the economy to 'get on with it' immediately
2/ The one that will give business and the country at least another 5 years of complete uncertainty
3/ The one that will give bushiness and the country another 50 years (©JRM) of complete uncertainty


or, in other terms

1/ Revoke Article 50
2/ Sign the WA that's taken 3.5 years (the easy bit) and start on the negotiation of the deal (the hard bit, which is laughingly estimated at 2 years :facepalm:)
3/ No deal. (I personally think JRM is a little optimistic with his 50 years but, for the sake of argument, let's go with that).
 
Last edited:






Blue Valkyrie

Not seen such Bravery!
Sep 1, 2012
32,165
Valhalla
After three and a bit years of completely throttling business and the economy, and ensuring the poorest have continued to suffer, I couldn't agree more.

So which decisive ending are you going for ?

1/ The one that will allow business and the economy to 'get on with it' immediately
2/ The one that will give business and the country at least another 5 years of complete uncertainty
3/ The one that will give bushiness and the country another 50 years ([emoji2398]JRM) of complete uncertainty


or, in other terms

1/ Revoke Article 50
2/ Sign the WA that's taken 3.5 years (the easy bit) and start on the negotiation of the deal (the hard bit, which is laughingly estimated at 2 years :facepalm:)
3/ No deal. (I personally think JRM is a little optimistic with his 50 years but, for the sake of argument, let's go with that).
The only 1 of those which doesn't restrict lifesaving isotopes and shelf-life limited drugs, and follows the advice of the referendum is.... option 2.

Options 1 and 3 each fail on one of the above fundamental requirements.
 


Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,087
Goldstone
We've never been a second class member. No other member has as many benefits or vetoes as us. France envies us our benefits.
Do they envy the subsidies they get for having more land than us?
 


Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat






Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
Tuesday will be interesting, apparently the Scottish appeal was able to see more evidence the UK one.

There is also another potential problem coming his way. Apparently none of the cabinet have seen the legal advice Boris was given before he suspended Parliament.

Unfortunately that breaks the ministerial code which was amended after the Chilcott Enquiry (post Iraq war etc..)

Oh Boris.

Ooopps.
 






Garry Nelson's teacher

Well-known member
May 11, 2015
5,257
Bloody Worthing!
:lolol:

Alexandra Phillips Brexit MEP is moaning about unelected judges!

Yes we can expect the usual chorus of condemnation. Notwithstanding the Supreme Court ruling this adds to the increasing weight of evidence that Johnson is a total and utter disaster (and disgrace) in the office. I know Remainers can be smug (there's a lot to be smug about), but some of us saw this coming. If anything the reality is worse than the expectations (and believe me these were as low as a caterpillar's shoe-laces).
 




Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
Yes we can expect the usual chorus of condemnation. Notwithstanding the Supreme Court ruling this adds to the increasing weight of evidence that Johnson is a total and utter disaster (and disgrace) in the office. I know Remainers can be smug (there's a lot to be smug about), but some of us saw this coming. If anything the reality is worse than the expectations (and believe me these were as low as a caterpillar's shoe-laces).

I agree but maybe you've missed the point.

The Brexit company has an owner and CEO, but no members so therefore not elected.
The judiciary are independent in this country and not elected.

The silly woman has shown her ignorance spectacularly.
 














BensGrandad

New member
Jul 13, 2003
72,015
Haywards Heath
Just for the record if I am alone at home I have Classic FM on but if wife is there she prefers the variety of music offered by Smooth FM. They have news bulletin every hour. This is just to explain to those who wish to ridicule the fact that it was mentioned on a Smooth Radio news bulletin.
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here