Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
She had a slender majority (5?) and wanted to increase it, but completely misread the mood of the country and lost a load of seats.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Politics] Brexit
- Thread starter KingstonSeagull
- Start date
She had a slender majority (5?) and wanted to increase it, but completely misread the mood of the country and lost a load of seats.
I've made my point. Nothing will change. There's an end to it.Nobody understands your argument.
there are literally a THOUSAND posts in this thread that consist purely of links to information, related to the topic.
Shall we have a thousand threads, for them?
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
Now that is really stretching the imagination. Honestly. Some of them don't live in Sussex, let alone Brighton, and will have issues with their own locality, and jobs etc. You cannot say everyone on Nsc thinks the same way. It's ludicrous.
Bold Seagull
strong and stable with me, or...
The reason they called it is irrelevant, they wanted a particular political outcome so called another General Election 2 years from the previous.
That is what democracy is. They were entitled to do that and see how much of the public had changed their mind in those 2 years.
As you say, it well and truly backfired because as it happened much of the public had changed their minds (as they are prone to do...).
You haven't got a point.
Nor should it
There's an end to it.
That's good then. Have a nice evening.
Is it PotG?
Thrifty non-licker
Kate Hoey having her bash now
Bold Seagull
strong and stable with me, or...
Within 2 years, are you saying much of the public had changed their minds? But that would mean....
Is it PotG?
Thrifty non-licker
But wasn't it agreed in Parliament by 6/1 to honour the result? That has never been carried out.
loco61
Well-known member
i see we have a new poll … can someone define what we mean by remain and what we mean by leave please
additionally i would love to vote but will almost certainly be denied the opportunity
additionally i would love to vote but will almost certainly be denied the opportunity
73% to 24% (see poll result at top of the page) isn't evidence enough for you? It's a 3 to 1 chance that anybody you speak to on NSC is a remainer.
Actually I do, but I've drawn a line under it and accepted the verdict. That should be the end of it for both views, eh?
Bold Seagull
strong and stable with me, or...
Parliament legislated to leave. It didn't agree how to leave. This is a failure of government not Parliament. I think it is important to make that distinction.
A 3 to 1 chance, if you are speaking to one of the 600 of NSC's 3,000+ active users who have voted on that poll
dingodan
New member
- Feb 16, 2011
- 10,080
I don't really know what you are talking about. I don't have an agenda. I don't know why you bring up the so called "alt-right".
I assume you mean that you are confident that my view (that we should leave?) is a minority view? Strange because we had a referendum and leave recieved the majority of votes.
Anyway, when I said you were in denial, I meant about this article you (seemed?) to mock. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-19300051
It's true. They are correct.
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
Business motion passes 322 votes to 277
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
Bercow selects motions C (Clarke), D (Boles), E (Kyle) and G (Cherry).
ManOfSussex
We wunt be druv
The 4 amendments have been selected:
C - Customs union
D - Common market 2.0
E - Confirmatory public vote
G - Revoking article 50 in the face of no-deal Brexit
C - Customs union
D - Common market 2.0
E - Confirmatory public vote
G - Revoking article 50 in the face of no-deal Brexit
A 20% sample is a pretty high percentage for a poll. A lot higher than many polls, I suspect. Seriously, do you really believe it isn't likely to be quite representative?
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
[tweet]1112748180914008064[/tweet]
[tweet]1112748668178833413[/tweet]
[tweet]1112749665806680064[/tweet]
[tweet]1112748668178833413[/tweet]
[tweet]1112749665806680064[/tweet]