The ERG always have been.
He's not a card carrier is he, but he was Vote Leave? Either way, in the face of this new tariff schedule that he himself doesn't know the effect of , he's happy for chaos.
The ERG always have been.
Did you actually listen to the clip? You seem to doff your cap to someone with a plum in their voice and take as read everything they say. It's clear he doesn't give a stuff about UK manufacturing or farming as any decline in that will be made up in opportunities in other industries, namely finance in which he has made substantial amounts. Very much a case of I'm alright jack.
I think that is the case. Wouldn't happen though, so Thursday would be a vote to extend.
This.Voted Remain the first time, would vote Remain the 2nd time.
Literally nothing has happened in the last couple of years that has made me even think about changing my vote.
Exactly, bureaucracy is a modern fact of live and solicitors I know are simply preparing to write it back into UK law.
There are many good reasons to leave the EU, but for the hardliners in the Tory party - Brexit is simply a means to an end. They hate regulation of any kind. It's a race to the bottom.
This isn't project fear - it's project ideology. A hark bark to the bonkers economists in the 1980s whose dreams simply failed. Rees Mogg is having another go.
The EU is protectionist, of course it is, but so is any trading block. If you operate within it - you are protected. In the mind of Rees Mogg, if your industry is protected by a tariff into the EU then you are a failure and should go out of business.
Listen to him. He never talks about business - he only talks about consumers. When he talks about "sovereignty" he really means personal freedom and f### everyone else.
He isn't right wing at all, but dangerously neo-liberal. Survival of the fittest, especially if you have a few million in the bank to start with.
I'm amazed anyone has fallen for him and his other financier mates like Farage.
Sure, but then the EU (rightly) tells us to **** right off with the extension, then we’re back to the same position.
So what then?
It'll be tight, but still too many MPs fall for the lie that keeping *no deal* on the table is necessary for negotiations. The negotiations are over.This is the amendment on the Government motion to look out for today that will rule out no deal entirely:
[tweet]1105733909873156096[/tweet]
Nick Watt on Newsnight last night thought it would pass:
[tweet]1105600499691085824[/tweet]
I guess if it happens it'll be MV3 and see if the ERG and DUP suddenly love the WA.
Two weeks or there about and it is still a complete unknown I think the origional timetable was for the withdrawl deal to be signed off by Christmas 2018 and by now we should be well into substantive trade talks
Our Parliment is a busted flush the building its antiquated procedures are no longer fit for purpose and needs to be swept away
I just watched a rerun of last evenings Newsnight and everything about Parliment has failed guest after guest politians, journalists the policticI class the establiment all out there being interviewed on college green exposed to the elements as the building is not large enough to allow interviews within its walls other than the lobby,
The chamber itself is not large enough to sit all the MPs while most MPs are forced to share offices such is the lack of space, when in the chamber MPs are lined up to ensure friction which makes for little more than great TV
None of this is conducive to good government in the modern day and is part of our broken political system
And to think [MENTION=5101]BigGully[/MENTION] once criticised me for saying Country in Crisis and Britain on the Brink. I can think of no other way to describe a nation with a leader who has no power and no authority whatsoever.
You weren't commenting on any future scenario it wasn't a forecast, you have just scrolled back over your timeline found some of your previous posts and somehow think they suddenly become valid as they fit in your mind what is happening today, you really are a numpty.
I was telling HT who is a committed Remainer and seems to think that the UK is incapable of most things and those posters on here that immediately accept any morsel of impending UK gloom that it is absurd to think that Brexit is likely to cause the outcomes he suggested, HT didn't once offer a view of how these things might be mitigated, it was his usual wallowing of UK incompetence and Brexiteers ignorance and it's all so predictable.
Change is happening, Brexit will involve some challenges, but to think the 5th or 6th largest economy in the world is unable to find solutions to pharmaceutical supply seems unlikely.
I doubt whether the government is as inept as you say, I suspect that there is an army of highly skilled civil servants that will unpick most regulation and deliver positive outcomes within time frames that don't adversely effect stuff.
I do agree that it is a valid position to challenge costs and implementation times if you think these exists, but that wasn't how HT instigated this debate.
I voted remain, but would vote to leave with Teresa May's deal, but wouldn't vote to leave with no deal, but as that isn't an option above I have no idea.
I'm at a point where I think no brexit could be more damaging for the country than no deal.
It'll be tight, but still too many MPs fall for the lie that keeping *no deal* on the table is necessary for negotiations. The negotiations are over.