Lincoln Imp
Well-known member
- Feb 2, 2009
- 5,964
That just echoes my post above #64612. Interviewers used to almost interrogate their guests or at least try to bring some balance. Now it is almost like giving them a platform to spread their lies.
Apart from a terror of being charged with bias by the currently ruling establishment the BBC is hamstrung by its obsession with appearing balanced at all times. Thus, before the referendum, we would have a measured, slightly critical, appraisal of the situation from - say - the Bank of England and this would have to be followed by a contrary rant from someone no one had ever heard of. They would both be given similar airtime, even if the second of the two was waffling about nothing at all.
The only time I recall the balance being forsaken was when BBC SE did a vox pop in East Kent and all three members of the public they interviewed were strongly pro-Brexit. (Mind you, as the interviewees' reasons for voting leave were (1) the number of muslims in the country (2) the number of fishing boats in Calais harbour and (3) the fact that Boris was more amusing than Dave I am still not sure which direction the bias was running in.)