Two Professors
Two Mad Professors
Says the man who goes to the trouble of creating a jpeg of a story but won't put a link (or quote another poster) in case the Internet Goblins get him.
How's that pulse feel ?
Tit.
Says the man who goes to the trouble of creating a jpeg of a story but won't put a link (or quote another poster) in case the Internet Goblins get him.
How's that pulse feel ?
NOTHINGS CHANGED, THE VOTE WAS TO LEAVE you know the DEMOCRATIC ONE ?
regards
DR
what were we promised ? apart from leaving the single market, customs union and ending free movement ie LEAVING THE EU COMPLETELYI'm afraid it has, little fella. It's just not what we were promised.
squeak piggy squeak2nd ref?
It would depend what we were voting about. A lot of Brexit people just wanted to get the E U
off our backs and be a free nation again, we knew there would be a short term economic upset but hat faith in British industry and trade to build new partnerships.
If all we are getting is a half baked exit , almost in name only, then we might as well stay in and keep a voice at the table.
Double ouch
Macron: "Brexit is the choice of the British people... pushed by those who predicted easy solutions... Those people are liars. They left the next day so they didn’t have to manage it."
Macron,the leader of a country with 22% youth unemployment to an unemployed trained gardener-"just cross the road.I'm sure there is a cafe with a vacancy".Got his family's snouts in the trough with him now and doesn't care.
Agree - an obvious candidate for the stupidest idea of the year. If the UK does go down the EU route of referendums (keep holding new ones until they get the 'right' result) leavers boycotting it would result in a remain landslide.
I'm afraid it has, little fella. It's just not what we were promised.
ONE OF YOUR HEROES ?Oh come on. The most quoted examples of those twice-held referendums are in Denmark and Ireland. In each case the people rejected certain elements of a treaty. The elements they objected to were looked at, modified or completely changed in an effort to meet their objections and they were then asked for their views on the modified document. That seems a good example of democracy to me, not a bad one. Your reference 'keep holding news ones until they get the right result' isn't fair.
That's RIP to the Chequers proposal today then. Judging by her press conference May's premiership might not be far behind it.
That's RIP to the Chequers proposal today then. Judging by her press conference May's premiership might not be far behind it.
Yes a true "Robin Hood", reminded TM she a Prime Minister not a Monarch
A fine legacy that will live on way beyond Brexit, that protects your rights and mine from governments with dictatorial ambitions
Not sure if ousting May will change anything..
Same divided Tory party, same EU framework, same parliamentary arithmetic
That's total bollocks. It's clear that there are politicians, on both sides of the Brexit debate, who hold very clear and sincere views about the EU. Furthermore, these politicians will act against their own self-interest to promote those views. Why has Anna Soubry endured a campaign of vilification and even threats if she didn't believe in Remaining? Why has Kate Hoey risked deselection as an MP by persisting in voting to leave. Both these politicians (and there are others) have acted completely against their self-interest in continuing the debate. And there are politicians who ignore their own beliefs: look at how May, a Remainer, has doggedly stuck to her Brexit plans, going completely against what she personally believes.
I know politicians get a bad press (and often it's deserved) but in this instance, with one exception, I can't think of a single politician who has put self-interest above his or her own beliefs.
The exception is, of course, Boris Johnson who cast aside his own support for the EU in favour of pursuing his own personal ambition. But you can't judge all politicians by Johnson's standard.