- Jul 10, 2003
- 28,501
I don't believe that he understands the term 'source' which is why he insults anyone who asks.
Which is quite ironic for someone who is Two Professors
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Politics] Brexit
- Thread starter KingstonSeagull
- Start date
I don't believe that he understands the term 'source' which is why he insults anyone who asks.
Which is quite ironic for someone who is Two Professors
Two Professors
Two Mad Professors
I don't believe that he understands the term 'source' which is why he insults anyone who asks.
Which is quite ironic for someone who is Two Professors
Don't know if you and that other dimwit are the same person,but here is an easy dictionary definition for you to try and understand:
The SOURCE for the legal argument was the late professor,no matter what you pair of rather dim posters say.
- Jul 10, 2003
- 28,501
Two Professors
Two Mad Professors
Here is another regular remoaner lie that has been put to rest today.SOURCE IS THE ONS,published on the BBC (for the thick as whale blubber)
Last edited:
Two Professors
Two Mad Professors
I use screenshots to post the pieces I find relevant.Very few people bother to open links,as life is too short to wade through piles of totally irrelevant crap.
Lincoln Imp
Well-known member
- Feb 2, 2009
- 5,964
Here is another regular remoaner lie that has been put to rest today.SOURCE IS THE ONS,published on the BBC (for the thick as whale blubber)
Sorry, what is the regular Remoaner lie?
Baldseagull
Well-known member
You did not present us with just his words though, the piece started with the (unknown) writers words, and he posed a question and then quoted the opinion of a Professor. What would be interesting to know (not a lot, but a little) is who wrote the words that are not the Professors and where it was published.
If Andy Naylor tells me in the Argus that Chris Hughton said something, the source is Andy Naylor in the Argus, as that is where I got the info. Andy Naylors source could be Chris himself or the Seagulls website news section, or a piece by another journalist, crucially Andy Naylor will have added some words himself, which cannot be obtained by asking Chris Hughton. So even if I could talk to the dead, rather than just the brain dead like yourself, I could not get everything you posted from Professor Wade.
Unless you yourself wrote the piece and were quoting the Professor directly from words spoken to you, or from a writing he authored, he was not your source of the information, and he still would not be the source of what was posted.
Baldseagull
Well-known member
I think I have proven my willingness to wade through piles of totally irrelevant crap, by reading and responding to your posts. If you don't post the links, it makes me think you don't want me to check the facts.
Do you remember your post claiming that an 18 month old news release was the latest word from the (incorrectly named) MD of a company and was on the pages of a (fictional) newspapers website?
D
Deleted member 22389
Guest
We where told that Europeans where leaving the UK because of the Brexit result, because they no longer felt welcome here anymore.
So you accuse Leavers of peddling propaganda and lies yet won't concede Merkel's speech happened nor that we don't control our own VAT rate ? That can only make you stupid, blind or a liar.
daveinprague
New member
Its widely reported. What do you know thats different?
daveinprague
New member
What is the EU rate of VAT and what is the UK rate? Arent they different?
His mum is Italian and she still lives in Moulsecoomb.
D
Deleted member 22389
Guest
I think the document above tells you the story. I think those numbers are about the same as they where before Brexit. Even migration watch which is a trusted source said an exodus of EU workers is nonsense. I don't know any Europeans that are going home either, many are already established in this country and don't want to go home because it's rubbish.
beorhthelm
A. Virgo, Football Genius
- Jul 21, 2003
- 36,229
its 15% standard rate with a reduced rate of 5% allowed in some goods/services. as you'll note we are above both those levels, but the point is we not permitted to set anything lower. hence arguments about tampons, energy and buildings work for charities. last year there was a proposal from the finance commissioner to remove all 0 rated, which would mean food, childrens clothing, books, transport and medicines all going up to the 5% level (they didnt go through with it so far, but it never goes away).
Lincoln Imp
Well-known member
- Feb 2, 2009
- 5,964
Are you saying someone on here has an Italian mum?
Not the point - the UK government can't lower any of our variable VAT rates without EU permission.
daveinprague
New member
To below the EU rate, which is 5% lower than ours anyway?
Brighton Mod
Its All Too Beautiful
The word BUT is the great eraser, it removes everything said before it so that a point can be made. Your still towing the line that there is a link between cancer treatment and Brexit. Its about as low as this arguement can be taken, you need to take a look at your thinking and what you are saying, because its not proven, has not surfaced during any Brexit debate and demonstrates how low some will go to justify their thoughts and political allegiances.
Please move on to another brexit related topic, because the more you try to justify your words, the more ridiculous you sound and these are my non Brexit thoughts.
Two Professors
Two Mad Professors
Suit yourself.I don't mind if you don't read my posts.Getting stroppy just proves the point raised.If you were that interested in the late Professor,there is a great deal on the internet,widely quoted and argued about,so as long as it's not RT what is your point.Or do you think everything not on Twatter is fake news?
People starting to be abusive about other posters family and medical conditions-starting to get very low.Play the ball.
Last edited: