Two Professors
Two Mad Professors
Actually,I was a bit quick off the mark saying the EU would trade with anybody.Wonder what a lot of the embargoed countries have in common?
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Politics] Brexit
- Thread starter KingstonSeagull
- Start date
studio150
Well-known member
Usual tactic misreads a post answers a completely different question than the one posed then rants on and on about how he has already answered the question, you just don't like his answer or its his opinion.
Comical really but effectively doesnt like being proved wrong
Green Cross Code Man
Wunt be druv
Demonstrates the entrenched positions of our politicians which are merely mirrored here with regurgitation of the same points and arguments. I wanted out but Brexit has turned half our country rabid whichever side they are on.
nicko31
Well-known member
On a serious note it beggars belief that these Tory MPs walked out. If they had issues they should have tried to resolve them.
So a question for the Remainers.
Why should the Leave voters take any notice of your "predictions", when we had months of you harping on about this "expert" said this and that, only to find out that the end of the UK was not nigh.
The "experts" changed their tune, so you now target more doom.
Why should we take any notice of you posters that were so gullible pre and post referendum.
Why should the Leave voters take any notice of your "predictions", when we had months of you harping on about this "expert" said this and that, only to find out that the end of the UK was not nigh.
The "experts" changed their tune, so you now target more doom.
Why should we take any notice of you posters that were so gullible pre and post referendum.
beorhthelm
A. Virgo, Football Genius
- Jul 21, 2003
- 36,026
you might be right, but isnt the point of risk to evaluate what the risk is, the likelihood and the impact? if the risk is small but likly, it maybe thats acceptable. claiming a 20% decline in GDP is just a nonsense, meaning either you dont know about the real risks or dont care and would rather be deliberately provocative. so you then build an image of people taking "wreckless risks", when no one is.
and in amongst all the bravado about how terrible it will be, i note only one responce on the question of what would be acceptable to lose in Brexit. so are remainers completely against any form of exit, any type of reform? maybe the vocal are, and the silent ones are just getting on with the business of making the best of leaving Europe.
Two Professors
Two Mad Professors
That is typical Westminster.Putting a clown that even Corbyn sacked in charge of a Brexit comittee,then he tries to railroad something through without consultation.
studio150
Well-known member
How about answering questions rather than asking them
Errm, because we haven't left yet, and won't do for another 2years at least. Osbourne etc predictions of a collapse of the western world was obviously hyperbole, but, then so was the £350 mil per week for the NHS,and the EU free land of milk and honey, claimed by the leave camp. As I said when this debacle was initiated, it will take at least five years after we leave for the full extent of leaving to take effect.
Whether we end up as winners or losers is in the lap of the Gods.
studio150
Well-known member
Typical leavers response anything that isn't all light and happiness in the post EU world they just refuse to accept
beorhthelm
A. Virgo, Football Genius
- Jul 21, 2003
- 36,026
you really think its normal to expect a committee to vote on and agree to a report they haven't seen? i wonder if the "walk out" is just dramatic license for adjournment.
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...off-date-european-parliament-freedom-movement
Not quite sure how you can trigger Article 50 with all this going on.
Not quite sure how you can trigger Article 50 with all this going on.
Fair enough, obviously the tune changed when the Remainers realised that the prophecies stated would happen straight away, were not going to happen.
So we have a new timetable now.
So why should we believe this new target.
Two Professors
Two Mad Professors
I would think that sort of attitude would trigger a quick 'Up yours,Delors' moment.But as it's in the Grauniad,& full of the usual caveats like 'it is understood' and 'it is reported',complete with quotes attributed to nonentities,it's just their usual page-filling tosh.
Gianni Pittella is a non entity?
beorhthelm
A. Virgo, Football Genius
- Jul 21, 2003
- 36,026
so what that article is saying is, should a situation occur that discriminates rights before and after a date, they will veto that deal leaving all EU citizen with no rights? does this sound to you like real or imaginary, sabre rattling policy?
Yoda
English & European
Sorry, genuine question, and sorry if you've already stated, but why do you want to leave the Single Market with the advantages we get from tax free trade and our largest customer with the potential that a trade tax could be put in place making our exports more expensive and less appealing and out imports also more expensive (the fall in Sterling is doing a great job at that already) causing our own inflation to rise even more?