Baldseagull
Well-known member
It is if you are trying to inject a degree of uncertainty into a construct.........however, if you wanted to be more certain you would use a common old English word like "will" instead. For example, take the two statements below:
There MAY be future terror attacks in Europe which MAY be committed by foreigners to that country. These future attacks MAY be terrifying for those involved and MAY result in fatalities.
There WILL be future terror attacks in Europe which WILL be committed by foreigners to that country. These future attacks WILL be terrifying for those involved and WILL result in fatalities.
This difference encapsulates our respective thinking.........it's why you don't care who enters this country, and why I utterly disagree with that view. Therefore nothing is being dodged because wherever we go on this debate we end up with this common denominator.
It's a key reason why the pro EU mob lost the argument about Brexit.
The question was, how was the attack in Dusseldorf connected to any terror attack elsewhere in Europe?
You MAY well dodge the question again, I WILL not be surprised if you do.