The people voted to leave the EU.
The former PM resigned in a big sulk, but the new one came in and said yes, we'll trigger Article 50 early next year.
Everybody keeping up, so far?
Then a bunch of mega-rich remoaners decided to splash a lot of cash (and therefore inevitably tax payers cash as well) by taking a case to the High Court to protect Parliamentary democracy, to challenge the legality of the Government triggering Article 50 without Parliamentary consent, and to use the independent judiciary to ensure no undemocratic precedents were set. Not trying to stop Brexit, overturn the referendum result, thwart the will of the people, no, of course not; they are just very nice people with a social conscience and a great respect for the tradition of an independent judiciary (probably as long as the independent judiciary agrees with them, I suspect).
(Actually, they did want to stop Brexit).
The High Court judges agreed with them, and said that the Government couldn't trigger Article 50 without the consent of Parliament, so the Government launches an appeal to the Supreme Court. All clear so far?
Today, a vote was put to Parliament. By a massive majority the MPs (to their credit; most of them are remainers) voted to approve the Government's plan to trigger Article 50 early in 2017.
So, Brexit has the peoples' approval, it now has the Parliamentary approval (OK, reluctantly) that many remoaners thought wouldn't happen. Makes the Supreme Court rather redundant really, as the conditions sought by the remoaners at the High Court are now in place.
I'm sure there'll be a lot of arguments, and vitriol and dirty tricks to come, but today the Commons have driven a MASSIVE nail into the remoaners' case. Whichever side you're on, that cannot be denied.
The former PM resigned in a big sulk, but the new one came in and said yes, we'll trigger Article 50 early next year.
Everybody keeping up, so far?
Then a bunch of mega-rich remoaners decided to splash a lot of cash (and therefore inevitably tax payers cash as well) by taking a case to the High Court to protect Parliamentary democracy, to challenge the legality of the Government triggering Article 50 without Parliamentary consent, and to use the independent judiciary to ensure no undemocratic precedents were set. Not trying to stop Brexit, overturn the referendum result, thwart the will of the people, no, of course not; they are just very nice people with a social conscience and a great respect for the tradition of an independent judiciary (probably as long as the independent judiciary agrees with them, I suspect).
(Actually, they did want to stop Brexit).
The High Court judges agreed with them, and said that the Government couldn't trigger Article 50 without the consent of Parliament, so the Government launches an appeal to the Supreme Court. All clear so far?
Today, a vote was put to Parliament. By a massive majority the MPs (to their credit; most of them are remainers) voted to approve the Government's plan to trigger Article 50 early in 2017.
So, Brexit has the peoples' approval, it now has the Parliamentary approval (OK, reluctantly) that many remoaners thought wouldn't happen. Makes the Supreme Court rather redundant really, as the conditions sought by the remoaners at the High Court are now in place.
I'm sure there'll be a lot of arguments, and vitriol and dirty tricks to come, but today the Commons have driven a MASSIVE nail into the remoaners' case. Whichever side you're on, that cannot be denied.