Lincoln Imp
Well-known member
- Feb 2, 2009
- 5,964
End universal suffrage now! We don't want any of that democracy carp round here!
You obviously failed to read the post I was responding to
End universal suffrage now! We don't want any of that democracy carp round here!
Weep*sigh*
Do you mean awash with posts under your current username or previous one.
Ha! I see your argument has again been shot down, you've been owned (again) and shut down so you decide to fall back on this accusation that I'm a poster called Nibble. I'm The Clamp, always have been. I think you should spend more time experiencing the world in front of your nose than worrying about posters on here, you'd be less dull and more informed. Read a book ya dafty.
And for the record, nobody won that referendum.
"Owned", really, you were "owned" when Labour did not get in, when Brexit won, when Trump won... and when you decided to keep whining and bleating. I suggest you read a book on backing winners..... ya "dafty".
Oh dear. Not great at this are you!
I didn't vote Labour. I prefer Trump to Clinton. I've stated this many times. If you did a little less ranting and paid a little more attention you'd pick up on these things and would have to find a other way to debate that incorporates nuance, detail and God Forbid, accuracy.
You'd still be ****ing useless at it but you'd be a damned sight more interesting.
Now, **** off, you're boring.
Membership of, or access to, both involve allowing free movement of people as well. In the full interview you kindly provided, Dan Hannan mentions Iceland, Norway and Switzerland.
For absolute clarity, access to, does not mean selling and buying on WTO terms, or any other negotiated set of tariffs, it means having no customs clearance, no import or export duties and no blocks of any kind on our exports or imports with the EU. If you think otherwise then it is you that fails to understand what Dan Hannan was saying.
If you accept that access to the single market will require free movement of people as well, can you now see that access is very much threatened by those insisting that leaving the EU must give us control of immigration?
Yawn. Piss off.It must be great being you, so knowledgeable, so wise, so modest... and so up your own arse. Just for the record I find your constant whining, not being able to acknowledge let alone accept outcomes.....boring, perhaps you would be wuse to foxtrot as well.
Anyway, lunch over. Do you work by the way.
Meanwhile in more Brexit news, away from the insults on North Stand Chat, The Scottish and Welsh Governments are being allowed to intervene in The Supreme Court case - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-38027230
Now we get to the nitty gritty. So all the bull stating that you thought some Brexit voters are thick, to what you really think, all of them. Could have saved a lot of dodging and pretending months ago.
thick people letting thick people into the countrywhere does the post you quote state that all leave voters are thick, i was for once merely agreeing with your comment about the number of thick people in this country. If you want to distribute that number to any particular group that is down to you but does not reflect my view.
No, I read it perfectly and understood it, thank you.You obviously failed to read the post I was responding to
So there are over 17 million thick people eh.
i dont accept that access to the single market requires accepting free movement of people.......because its simply not true.
every country has access to the single market unless under trade sanctions.
Where does the post you quote state that all leave voters are thick, I was for once merely agreeing with your comment about the number of thick people in this country. If you want to distribute that number to any particular group that is down to you but does not reflect my view.
Well there are around 9 million people in the UK who have not mastered basic reading, writing and maths so i'd surmise they are a bit thick but I wouldn't suggest for a minute everyone who voted leave is stupid. It's a bit like this thread, loads of different angles and some well reasoned arguments on both sides, just none from you i'm afraid.