Ernest
Stupid IDIOT
Indeed it does Mr Thunder Bolt
Indeed it does Mr Thunder Bolt
I'm probably going to get flamed for this.
I'd leave Stokes at home. It's probably as good as forfeiting the series but this is about the long term good of the player. In Stokes we have a guy who can be at the top level for another 10 years or we can have a Flintoff that has two years at the top and a whole load of mediocre.
Perhaps a period of reflection might enable him to focus on being the best cricketer he can possibly be.
I'd only leave him out if he felt there was to much distraction. In terms of his behaviour I don't think he did anything wrong.
Of course there's something wrong. He's out, pissed, in season, 36 hours before he should be playing. Top level professional sportsmen like Stokes don't do that these days, it is incongruous with being the best in world (something I very much hope Stokes aspires to be.)
It's also not the first time off the field conduct has been an issue with him. I believe if he gets away with it, it will be bad for him long term in the same way as Flintoff's lack of off the field professionalism undoubtedly shortened his career.
He didn't just defend himself though. Before he knocked the bloke out, there were plenty of opportunities to walk away. The two blokes he was fighting were backing away, and his mates were urging him to stop. But Stokes kept going.Yeah ok, you're right being pissed 36 hours before he should be playing isn't great. When I said he hadn't done anything wrong, I was referring to him defending himself. But you're right he shouldn't have been in that situation. However, as frustrating as that is, I don't think he should be dropped because of it. I'm fairly sure there are plenty of players in both the England and Australian teams that will have been out for drinks 36 hours before a game.
Yeah ok, you're right being pissed 36 hours before he should be playing isn't great. When I said he hadn't done anything wrong, I was referring to him defending himself. But you're right he shouldn't have been in that situation. However, as frustrating as that is, I don't think he should be dropped because of it. I'm fairly sure there are plenty of players in both the England and Australian teams that will have been out for drinks 36 hours before a game.
He didn't just defend himself though. Before he knocked the bloke out, there were plenty of opportunities to walk away. The two blokes he was fighting were backing away, and his mates were urging him to stop. But Stokes kept going.
Given that the bloke he hit fell back and hit his head on the road, Stokes should be thankful that this didn't have a much, much worse ending.
Its a tough one. I respect both sides of this debate.
I just get a hunch with Stokes, taking into account prior behaviour that there is an issue here that needs addressing rather than ignoring and hoping it will go away. There's also the ghost of Trott, Trescothick, Flintoff and Harmison and their self-acknowledged mental health battles lingering over this one for me. Perhaps it is time for the ECB to prove they have learnt some lessons and put the long term wellbeing of the player in front of short term concerns.
I'm not into the idea of 'punishing' Stokes, that'll be for the courts to decide. I just want his career to be the longest and most fruitful it can possibly be for England and at the moment alarm bells are ringing.
I think it's a little bit unfair to count Trescothick and Trott in that category as they had different demons.
Video looks bad for him. Can't say I'm that shocked though, the bloke has always been a petulant and hyper aggressive prick.
David Warner punched Joe Root in the face when pissed up. I don't recall him being banned / charged by the police etc.
If it looks bad for him how do you think the other guy feels getting punched out like that? No excuse from Stokes - unacceptable way for an adult to behave. Brat.
And crickets shit anyway.
David Warner punched Joe Root in the face when pissed up. I don't recall him being banned / charged by the police etc.