What would they know?Football League say they've complied.
What would they know?Football League say they've complied.
Burnley have been promoted twice with one hand tied behind their back because they chose - rather naively - to comply with FFP (although in 2013/14 we had no choice due to being skint - hence the Charlie Austin sale the day before the start of the new season).
We're only a relegation, a manager change and an average season in the Championship away from losing £6/7 million a season again.
Remind me how much the club is currently losing each season?
Well we aren't currently losing anything and haven't for 3 years now.
You'll no doubt have to ask a Brighton fan about their finances though.
Remind me how much the club is currently losing each season?
The "30 million" includes money already spent and gone on the stadium build, and elite performance center - not money that has to found on an ongoing basis.If Brighton get promotion, the losses will be £30 mill for the season ( according to NSC's financial expert El Pres )
Frightening for such a well run club.
This. No way would he telegraph his willingness to spend to all and sundry.Point is this is classic TB. Can you imagine him saying:
"Yes, we plan to push the boat out. Money is no object. We will pay top dollar". He will do whatever makes sense, and he won't be announcing his plans. Fact.
Yes. £15 million for Dunk would be 'the fire sale'.Would I be right in thinking the next accounts issued (this season) will be the first under new 'rolling 3 year plan FFP'?
So in theory clubs can 'go for it' in year 1.
Then either:-
- Gain promotion with a seemingly FFP busting loss
or
- Miss promotion and balance the books in either year 2 or 3 with a fire sale.
The "30 million" includes money already spent and gone on the stadium build, and elite performance center - not money that has to found on an ongoing basis.
Does anyone know how much the cheque is that Tony has to write each season to balance the books - minus any tax reduction he can get for his other businesses by writing such a cheque ? That is the important figure.
Would I be right in thinking the next accounts issued (this season) will be the first under new 'rolling 3 year plan FFP'?
So in theory clubs can 'go for it' in year 1.
Then either:-
- Gain promotion with a seemingly FFP busting loss
or
- Miss promotion and balance the books in either year 2 or 3 with a fire sale.
That sounds like a can of worms. Surely a note with the projections saying that player x would be sold in the summer would be enough to delay any points deduction. If not surely there would be a legal challenge ? You can't issue a sanction based on ifs and buts.It's not quite as simple as that. Clubs have to submit budgets to the EFL on a regular basis, and if they show that the FFP limits are likely to be breached then there can be sanctions...including points deductions.
That sounds like a can of worms. Surely a note with the projections saying that player x would be sold in the summer would be enough to delay any points deduction. If not surely there would be a legal challenge ?
Best just ditch FFP.
It will have lawyers reaching for ther Range Rover brochures should the EFL, which to date has shown the backbone of a jellyfish in relation to Leicester and QPR, try to enforce a points deduction.
Clubs have to submit their budgets by 1 March 2017, and this allows the EFL's 'independent committee' to
(a) Fine clubs
(b) Points deduction
(c) Drop clubs from an automatic promotion position into the playoffs (or even out of the playoffs)
(d) Drop clubs out of the playoffs
That sounds like a can of worms. Surely a note with the projections saying that player x would be sold in the summer would be enough to delay any points deduction. If not surely there would be a legal challenge ? You can't issue a sanction based on ifs and buts.
Best just ditch FFP.
That would be the green light for billionaire owners of clubs such as Wednesday, together with a no holds barred approach from relegated PL clubs already with the advantage of parachute monies, to massively outspend TB on transfer fees and players wages, to gain promotion.
Following the QPR, Bournemouth and Leicester cheating method, but made legal.
FFP gives far more clubs a chance of promotion. Look at Burnley.
As well as making insolvencies in the Football League less likely, where creditors are the losers (Palace, Leicester and Southampton several times each, Portsmouth, etc.).
If Brighton get promotion, the losses will be £30 mill for the season ( according to NSC's financial expert El Pres )
Frightening for such a well run club.
Case in point.
The 26M figure (to be fair you creeped it up a mere 4M which is a modest increase compared to social media) are not all losses in the context of a playing/operating budget, otherwise we would fail FFP (13M).
Much of it is TB's willingness to invest structurally in the future (training ground,academy), and depreciation on the stadium.. but then you already knew that.