doing very well then if he isnt. i would say the exact opposite is true.
He's more a figure head than a politician.
doing very well then if he isnt. i would say the exact opposite is true.
Fair point. When I say "natural politician", I probably mean "natural cabinet minister".
He's more a figure head than a politician.
Absolutely not, the man is a buffoon
Mayor of London is the perfect role for him.
as an indicator of the paucity of intellect and talent in politics - and perhaps the depths to which we have sunk in our adoration of "celebrity" - the concept of Boris as PM just about says it all
Like we havent done so several times already ?Good god no, we don't want to turn into the US by voting buffoons in as leader of the country.
You expect to be taken seriously mentioning principled person in the same breath as Livingstone.He's not a natural politician. I imagine he would be a disaster running the country and would kop lots of unwarranted flak because he's not slippery enough.
The Mayor of London office is a great post for a principled person with a bit of passion, their head scewed on, and for whom you wouldn't trust with the purse strings. It's why Livingstone and Johnson have both made pretty good Mayors, IMO.
You expect to be taken seriously mentioning principled person in the same breath as Livingstone.
I'm not getting into a debate over the rights and wrongs of Livingstone, but for what it's worth, I think he is quite a prinicipled man. I'll give two examples:You expect to be taken seriously mentioning principled person in the same breath as Livingstone.
Ssshhh!! you're not allowed to point this out !why is he not a buffoon? giving money hand over fist to a crook to advise him on black issues, who was raised by an all white family in an all white town 250 miles away from london. gleefully revelling in the destruction of white communities in inner london, hobnobbing with the IRA who were bombing his own city, the list is endless. its frightening that provincial English people which this doesnt affect would prefer him over a very well educated intellectual with Britains best interests at heart, because of some vague idea that one colour party is cooler than another colour party.
Ssshhh!! you're not allowed to point this out !
i wish i was as thick as most elected members of parliament. most would wipe the floor with us, there may be a lot of wallies but very few genuinely stupid people. that tends to be the electorate and people like us commentating.
So how was the reporter "hounding" him ?? this is a transcript of the exchange , the london mayor , basically refusing to talk to london's only evening paperI'm not getting into a debate over the rights and wrongs of Livingstone, but for what it's worth, I think he is quite a prinicipled man. I'll give two examples:
1) he put his career on the line over the congestion charge. How many ministers of any party would have the stones to do something like that.
2) he quite rightly refused to back down when that little prick at the Standard kept hounding him, resulting in Livingstone comparing him to an SS guard.
So how was the reporter "hounding" him ??
They're all shysters and Livingston and Johnson are no different