Congratulations NSC, you have got to 10 posts without anyone being a precious bellend on the subject.
Ooh, I think you may have made the breakthrough.
Congratulations NSC, you have got to 10 posts without anyone being a precious bellend on the subject.
Just read a couple of the classics years ago. That doesn't surprise me though.Aye.
Have you ever read of the books btw...some of them ( a view to a kill eg) bear absolutely no resemblance whatsoever to the film...the only thing that is the same is 007 and M
Just read a couple of the classics years ago. That doesn't surprise me though.
Personally I don't see why she wasn't just cast as 008 or something similar and then they build a series of films out of that (much like they've done with the Spider-man series). You could easily have had numerous good conflicts out of that between 007 and the new star of MI6. But it's happened now and we may as well just get on with it.
What will be interesting also, from a narrative standpoint, is how they handle a minority character in the role. One of the best things about James Bond (rather than 007 specifically) was his character defaults and the stories that were derived from that. If they don't add similar depth and weakness to the new 007 even though she's from a minority background then that could easily lead to the end of this series of films. I guess we'll find out soon enough how they handle it!
Does anybody care enough to be a bellend about it, let alone a precious one?
I'm waiting patiently for [MENTION=15278]Beach Seagull[/MENTION] 's take on it.
Eh? His character is James Bond 007! So if his character leaves MI6, then how can she be the next 007? Unless it means the actor is leaving , which we all know...BUT. 007 has always been a man...ok a man with different faces, but they are all one character.....a woman wouldn’t be right would it!
imagine casting say Gemma Chan as Poirot.
No problem with this at all. Unless, like some others have said, they go all Ghostbusters with it.
Only thing I find a bit odd is that I am sure in one of the films they referenced Bonds (now dead) predecessor as 006 which has made me always assume that the next agent would get the next number. Plenty of films have taken bigger deviations so not going to get too hung up on it
Well if this actress is on screen for moments less than Craig, she should very much obviously be paid less.