mejonaNO12 aka riskit
Well-known member
And if Bolton fall out of the league because of piss poor financial management then good riddance.
We were a boardroom takeover away from liquidation.
And if Bolton fall out of the league because of piss poor financial management then good riddance.
We were a boardroom takeover away from liquidation.
Christ, I didn't realise it was the Chinese that came up with the offside rule, crossbar, goal nets, corner flags, linesmen, substitutes, half-time and the referee's whistle.
We refined it. They invented it.
Refined it? I suppose caveman A twats caveman B and they invented boxing? Neanderthal clubs bison testicle down well and invents golf.
I don't know why you're arguing this. FIFA, our fearsome and benevolent overlords, have acknowledged it to be the first evidence of what we know as Association Football.
This.
Bolton overspent and over borrowed, which was entirely the fault of owners past. This can’t be attributed to the PL.
A shame for the staff and any creditors who’ll only receive x pence in the pound of debt.
In fairness, the no relegation plan was Phil Gartside/Fat Sam, nothing to do with the current lot
Well aware of that. Bit different though. Bolton had something like 11 years in the Premier League and are now having trouble finding £5m?
EDIT: Yep, 11 years:
[tweet]1039381897124737025[/tweet]
I'm only having a bit of fun, but knowing FIFA they were probably courting the Chinese at the time for money.
So they had REALLY poor financial management in that case
What differes between fans suffering because their clubs owners poorly managed a low turnover or a high turnover?
Either way they have mismanaged their situation and it is the fans who suffer if they go under.
Yes. But in this case it wasn't the owner, it was the CEO.
I know you're not supposed to speak ill of the dead but Gartside was a scumbag. He (allegedly) rinsed the club for millions, making sure that his agent mate / mates dealt with all transfer activities. Of course BFS had nothing to do with it.
It was Gartside who was the main proponent of a closed shop PL and once Bolton were relegated and the full extent of their financial mess was exposed, you can see why.
So a once great football club ends up in a total mess and poor old Eddie Davies (who has just died, RIP) lost around £200m.
Thanks.
So if an offer was made to buy out the club, would the administrators also place a value on the footballers as an asset?
Ie, the offer being made to buy the clubs assets would include those player valuations?
Because, as I understand it, when the admin is considering an offer for the clubs asset's, they will be assessing whether they can realise better for the creditors by selling the assets instead (including the players).
Or, would the administrator assume they would receive nothing in a close down selling of the players (assets) and then anything actually realised in transfer fees is a bonus?
Eddie Davis was a good guy. But a mistake to entrust all power to his senior employee, Gartside. The equivalent would be TB taking a distant back seat and allowing employee PB de facto control the club with no checks and balances.
I remember devious Gartside too. He was filmed doing secret deals, with a young football agent, who happened to have the name Greg Allardyce. Plus the later proven; VAT, national insurance and illegal agent activities at Bolton.
Well aware of that. Bit different though. Bolton had something like 11 years in the Premier League and are now having trouble finding £5m?
EDIT: Yep, 11 years:
[tweet]1039381897124737025[/tweet]
Being a founder member of the Football League should not carry any weight. If they receive a 12 point penalty how is that a sad day for English football.
I would have thought that a sadder day would have been when clubs benefited from going into administration meaning better run clubs missed out on promotion.
I'm no ecomomist but doesn't that smell of people taking Captain Bob-esque amounts of money out of the business while its income went from Daily Mirrorly to Croydon Advertiser stylee? It isn't as if they sunk vast sums into ludicrous Bentekesque transfers and laughable (ha ha) salaries?
One wonders which is worse, vainglorious charming chancers with extraordinary hair, or tubby throwback conmen with chip grease on their supertight waistcoats. Time will tell.
I'm no economist either, but since Bolton have never been placed into administration, i'd say that Mr Weatherspoon smells of somebody talking out of their arse.