Silent Bob
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
- Dec 6, 2004
- 22,172
Racism doesn't mean not standing up for what you believe in, it means being racist.BNP are not racist's, just standing up for what they believe in.
Racism doesn't mean not standing up for what you believe in, it means being racist.BNP are not racist's, just standing up for what they believe in.
No, he has just stated his opinion on the article, hardly 'shouting him down'.
India would not tolerate millions of non-Indians taking over that society.
So explain to me the difference between that and good old fashioned racism.
To be fair they didn't have much choice.
The debate on immigration has rarely been properly had because it's such a long, drawn out, almost unsolvable issue.
What doesn't help (and this is where the name-calling starts) is when someone kicks off the debate with an extremist, ill-though out viewpoint (someone will say 'close the borders, stop immigration' the next will say 'everyone's welcome'). There's no sensible debate to be had with that, and the likes of the Daily Mail or the two-bit drivel in The Socialist Worker really don't help one bit.
Somewhere in the middle there will be a broad consensus that has to be fluid in its resolution - there's no one-size-fits-all answer.
But it's good we're having the debate.
dismissing as "absurd" and "laughable" are not how you start sensible debate.
What and you putting this little man falling down and not counter arguing against my points is having a sensible debate is it?
BNP are not racist's, just standing up for what they believe in.
Can anyone imagine Saudi Arabia allowing the mass immigration of Christians, so that in a few decades it would no longer be an Islamic country?
What and you... not counter arguing against my points is having a sensible debate is it?
Ok I do agree with that, but the Tories are not an extremist organisation, they are a main stream political party with numerous non white members and whose previous leader was Jewish. I have seen left wing politicians, left wing journalists and trades union leaders implying their immigration policies were racist time and again on things like question time, so that in the end the Cons have actually dropped immigration control of their main agenda. But it doesn't solve the problem and still in certain areas of the country the problems with mass immigration goes on and people like the BNP fill the vacuum.
That's a waste of their deposit then.
There is more chance of Gordon Brown changing his name to Wendy and announcing he's having gender reassignment surgery next Friday morning, than of any candidate other than Nicholas Soames winning Mid Sussex.
And frankly even if the Conservatives decided (for a laugh) not to contest the seat, the BNP's single issue campaigning wouldn't hold much weight in the leafy lanes of middle class Mid Sussex. I doubt there's many people living in Burgess Hill or Haywards Heath that are ranting about losing jobs to immigrants.
Go and read the Sun and the Daily Mail. It's the same just the other way. Complete slurs that the lib dems want "uncontrolled" immigration using terms like "swamped" etc. I agree that too many people glibly say the tories are underlyingly racist and this constricts a debate but can you not see that by singly blaming it on the left wing you are contributing to it? We need to have an amnesty on immigration pronouncements and start from scratch.
Ok I do agree with that, but the Tories are not an extremist organisation, they are a main stream political party with numerous non white members and whose previous leader was Jewish. I have seen left wing politicians, left wing journalists and trades union leaders implying their immigration policies were racist time and again on things like question time, so that in the end the Cons have actually dropped immigration control of their main agenda. But it doesn't solve the problem and still in certain areas of the country the problems with mass immigration goes on and people like the BNP fill the vacuum.
what part of tenants of the housing association, IE not open market are you having difficulty with ?So the flat is rented on an open market and the Poles applied for it. How is that different from anyone else ?
I agree such scaremongering is wrong and it does not allow for a sensible debate, but this has only really happened in the last two weeks when the Liberals have seemed to have a major chance of power following Clegg's good showing, not for the last ten years or so with the Tories.
The manner is the old left and the old right trading insults. "You're a bunch of racists..." says one side; "Why don't you piss off to Russia...?" say the other. Like that ever helped a debate.
It's interesting you should mention the previous leader being Jewish. Leon Brittain and Nigel Lawson were abused and scorned for their Jewish heritage by members of the Conservative Parliamentary Party while they were in the Cabinet.
Unfortunately i consider parts of his piece absurd and laughable , so i dont know how you think people should comment ?dismissing as "absurd" and "laughable" are not how you start sensible debate.
perfectly illustrates that no side seems capable of a proper discourse on the subject, it seems as if there is no middle ground (at least thats the impression i get).
what part of tenants of the housing association, IE not open market are you having difficulty with ?