swindonseagull
Well-known member
Easy.....loan him to USG
USG loans him to BHA
USG loans him to BHA
Loan with obligation to buy?
I know, what’s the point as it’s a dressed up sale but maybe from an accountancy perspective? Appreciate we aren’t in a poor position financially
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Well some is fact - the rules don't allow us to loan him. Naylor Said Yes in The Athletic. So for this to happen Chelsea have to soften their stance on wanting a loan - multiple reports of this across different sources.
The option to buy at the end of the season is irrelevant as it's still a temporary transfer for this season. We cannot register another player from Chelsea on a temporary registration this season while Colwill is here.
Obligation, not option?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
V.7.5. the maximum number of Temporary Transfers to any one Club registrable
in the same Season shall be four and in no circumstances shall more than
one be from the same Transferor Club at any one time save there shall be
excluded from these numbers any Temporary Transfer of the kind
described in V.7.6.1 or V.7.6.2;
V.7.6. not more than two Temporary Transfers shall be registered by a Club at
the same time except that there shall be excluded from that number:
V.7.6.1. any Temporary Transfer which become permanent; and
V.7.6.2. the Temporary Transfer of a goalkeeper which in its absolute
discretion the Board may allow in circumstances it considers to
be exceptional;
I've looked in the Premier league rules and it's not mentioned
Actually I stand corrected. There may be a possibilty
https://resources.premierleague.com...e6e1/PL_Handbook_2021_22_DIGITAL_29.11.21.pdf
The use of the word become does make the rule some what open to interpretation. Does it mean you can register someone if there is an obligation to buy that player at the end of the season, or does it mean you can register a second player from a club once the other loan deal has become permanent. If its the former we can sign Gilmour, if it's the later then we still need to buy Colwill.
'closing in on a permanent move' according to the telegraph....
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/footbal...g-race-sign-chelseas-billy-gilmour-permanent/
No price mentioned. Would have been close to £30m+ 18 months ago. How low will Chelsea go?
In the Mail Online's story about us being interested, there is a below the line comment that says:
"I think Potter will guide this kid in the correct way. I wouldn't be surprised if he went there and Brighton triple his feet within 2 years."
I'm not sure whether this means that we'd have central midfielder with six feet, or one that's nearly 17 feet tall. Either way it sounds useful.
In the Mail Online's story about us being interested, there is a below the line comment that says:
"I think Potter will guide this kid in the correct way. I wouldn't be surprised if he went there and Brighton triple his feet within 2 years."
I'm not sure whether this means that we'd have central midfielder with six feet, or one that's nearly 17 feet tall. Either way it sounds useful.
In the Mail Online's story about us being interested, there is a below the line comment that says:
"I think Potter will guide this kid in the correct way. I wouldn't be surprised if he went there and Brighton triple his feet within 2 years."
I'm not sure whether this means that we'd have central midfielder with six feet, or one that's nearly 17 feet tall. Either way it sounds useful.
could be that he'll be a shoe size 24 by the year 2024?
No thanks.
why, might I ask? consistently rated as one of chelsea's best prospects, has already picked up a PL man of the match award for chelsea and multiple for scotland. or does not having a great season in a dreadful norwich team automatically preclude him from ever fulfilling his potential?