Hampster Gull
Well-known member
- Dec 22, 2010
- 13,465
If you'd like to have a few drinks while I explain how drastically wrong you are I'd be happy to oblige, but it's really quite tedious arguing with those of you who continue to subscribe to trickle down economics and neo liberalism despite their clear failings. Seriously Xmas is barely over and you're happy to say caring about people is outdated, FFS.
As you can see already it's quite dull.
I'll leave you with one question just for fun:
Accepting the importance of reducing the structural deficit (still above pre banking crisis levels), even with government borrowing rates low though still higher than previously (since the tories lost our AAA credit rating) how does selling off state assets which return a profit (Royal Mail last term, C4 this) for a sum which fails to even reduce interest payments by an equivalent amount to the profit previously generated make economic sense, even if the loss of structural assets including extremely valuable land is not accounted for?
You have the classic left wing failing that anyone who doesn't agree with you doesn't care. School boy stuff.