It is reported was on about 8 million which is huge. Obviously he got them into the championship so that could be argued good value but that is a huge salary. My point is about the apparent contradiction of the “man of the people” tag when he gets so highly paid. Surely if he was that much of a man of the people he would do it for a fraction of that and insist it was spent on the team?
I class it as excessive in comparison to other premier league managers. Is he worth 4 times as much as potter?
Well, if your figures are correct, you have access to information (especially Potter's salary) that is beyond my reach.
Excessive though? In a free market economy it is what it is Big Sam was (allegedly) on far more.