BensGrandad

[Hillian1]

I know who that consortium was but am not prepared to go into it further but it was a genuine attempt to buy the club from Archer using BG as the front man because of his known affiliation with the club. He wouldnt thank me if I disclosed names so lets close that chapter in life.

You are clearly mad.

You are Simon, and I claim my £5.00

 

[The Camel]

Thoroughly baffling to me that people are unable to refrain from making posts that lead to infractions let alone bans.

If I was in control of a forum I wouldn't be nearly as tolerant as Bozza and the mods are here.

You'd get one warning and then if you broke the rules again you'd get a perma ban.

Just engage your brain for 5 seconds and you'd never even get a warning.

 

[El Presidente]

If it's locked, it cannot be resurrected.

Agreed, but I am sure flying high would have started a fresh one.

If BG didn't ask one of his friends to start it, it wouldn't be here in the first place.

The history of what happened is as follows:

1: BG was given an infraction for the paedophile related comments that generated a ban, no mention was made of the event in moderating decisions, so the ban could have potentiall gone under the radar.

2: BG asked his friend flying high to start a thread about the ban, so clearly was happy to be discussed.

3: The ban subsequently expired.

4: BG was given a further infraction in relation to anti-semitic comments in relation to Daniel Levy/Tony Bloom, this triggered a further ban under the totting up rules.

5: After a debate at mod towers, the infraction points were reduced, but this put him on the equivalent of four bookings.

6: BG made comments today in relation to the club and Remembrance Sunday (which, although unpleasant, did not generate any reaction at Mod Towers) and then about current service personnel, which led to the post being reported. A minor infraction was given, which resulted in a ban. Again, there was no discussion of the event in the 'Moderating Decisions' section of NSC, so no one, apart from BG himself, would have been aware of what was happening.

7: BG immediately contacted flying high again, and the whole tedious cycle recommenced.

 

[BHAFC_Pandapops]

Paul Barber stole BG's poppy as part of a cost cutting exercise to ensure compliance with FFP.

That's hardly surprising..

 

[Barrel of Fun]

No I am not but know him and his affiliation with Brighton more than most.

I'd imagine you do know him as you share the same surname, right?

 

[flying high]

Could be but you will get their eventually if you keep guessing but I shallnt say if you are right or wrong

 

[Keeping The Dream Alive.]

BG and flying high have remarkably similar writing styles

 

[flying high]

Thats a surprise

 

[8ace]

Could be but you will get their eventually if you keep guessing but I shallnt say if you are right or wrong

What do you think of the Wetherspoons in Haywards Heath

 

[flying high]

Where is that?

 

[Mackenzie]

Do you like fish and chips?

 

[flying high]

Sometimes

 

[Mackenzie]

What do you think of the Wetherspoons in Haywards Heath

Do you like fish and chips?

BG and flying high have remarkably similar writing styles

I'd imagine you do know him as you share the same surname, right?

Are you Charles?

 

[KZNSeagull]

BG and flying high have remarkably similar writing styles

Same non-use of the "Reply with Quote" functionality too.

 

[8ace]

Where is that?

The Broadway.