There are 261,000 empty properties nationwide, so use either your imagination or your maths skills and work it out for yourself.How many empty flats do you think there are in Crawley?
While you’re at it look up “example” in the dictionary.
There are 261,000 empty properties nationwide, so use either your imagination or your maths skills and work it out for yourself.How many empty flats do you think there are in Crawley?
your teenagers will look forward to out of the area for their northern terrace or dilapidated house when the time comes. thats where most the number of unused houses are, along with some expat owned, inbetween rents, building works.Aye. They're terrible.
Don't get me wrong, my point isn't that we don't need houses. We obviously do. I've got two teenagers, I don't want them staying here forever because they can't get a place of their own. And homelessness is a terrible thing.
But as I replied to the other guy, with a QUARTER OF A MILLION unused / empty homes in this country, the answer isn't simply to build more and screw the infrastructure and car use implications.
And the vast majority of those empty properties are hundreds of miles away from Brighton. Come on use your common sense to calculate why there would be any significant number of what you called, "warm flats" just lying empty in Crawley.There are 261,000 empty properties nationwide, so use either your imagination or your maths skills and work it out for yourself.
While you’re at it look up “example” in the dictionary.
I’m guessing, but I’m pretty sure you don’t have the numbers either.And the vast majority of those empty properties are hundreds of miles away from Brighton. Come on use your common sense to calculate why there would be any significant number of what you called, "warm flats" just lying empty in Crawley.
This, this and this. Of all the places you’d expect to NOT find NIMBY’S, it’d be NSC. And yet…We need housing - NIMBYS OUT
No. We need housing in appropriate places with the additional services - schools, GPs, public transport etc - to support them. One without the other is pointless.
Nice meme copying. Well done
How many suitable other sites for a Brighton and hove Albion stadium were there NATIONWIDE? Probably a great site up north somewhere? Why didn’t all settle for that one? Why’d we have to ruin the natural character of falmer village?I’m guessing, but I’m pretty sure you don’t have the numbers either.
You don’t have a decent reply because you realise it’s bang on and you’re a nimbyNice meme copying. Well done
Why are you equating a home for a family with a football stadium?How many suitable other sites for a Brighton and hove Albion stadium were there NATIONWIDE? Probably a great site up north somewhere? Why didn’t all settle for that one? Why’d we have to ruin the natural character of falmer village?
They both wanted to be in Brighton?Why are you equating a home for a family with a football stadium?
Yeah, it’s exactly the same caseThey both wanted to be in Brighton?
The Timpson family, who seem like very decent humans, did some work around regenerating dead high streets by converting longterm empty retail and office units to affordable housing and bringing people (and income) back. The estimate was something like 20,000 homes created with low investment and done relatively quickly before work begins on the harder to convert property. A drop in the ocean, but it's short sighted to keep finding new land to build on when there is more than one practical solution available and being ignored.
Are you really guessing that the number is significant?I’m guessing, but I’m pretty sure you don’t have the numbers either.
To be fair, it’s good to see NSC’s man of the people (never wrong, apart from Solly March) on the side of big business for once.You don’t have a decent reply because you realise it’s bang on and you’re a nimby
Four years before they’re even renovated? Alternative being a social rent to a homeless family? Ok then.Are you really guessing that the number is significant?
My suggestions regarding empty properties, which includes any already up for sale or rent, is that after one year unoccupied council tax is doubled, tripled the following year and so on. At some point the owners are going to either hand over the property to the council or be forced to do so by the courts. This includes holiday homes that are empty for the majority of the year and those kept as "investments".
I don’t disagree with that. As often, the binary nature of debate spoils nuance.
The number of empty properties needs to be reduced in conjunction with a sensible entire infrastructure build in other places.
Lobbing up flat pack on green belt that will be bought for over market price by idiot DFLs helps no one except the developers.