T'is ok my comment wasn't aimed at any of your posts on this thread, you just provided a nice segway.I don't understand
T'is ok my comment wasn't aimed at any of your posts on this thread, you just provided a nice segway.I don't understand
It's clearly not serious. Every time there's a cyclist thread the same old cliched complaints come up. 'Why don't they pay road tax?', 'Why do they cycle on the road when there's a perfectly good cycle lane?', 'Why do they ignore traffic lights?' etc. All clearly ignorant, Daily Mail-esque bollocks.
[MENTION=33848]The Clamp[/MENTION] was broadening the range of ridiculous, cliched, reactionary questions.
For me, personally, I don't cycle on cycle paths because they are not fit for my purpose.So why do cyclists cycle on the road when there's a perfectly good cycle lane?
Doesn't seem an unreasonable question to me....
And yes I'm a cyclist.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
For me, personally, I don't cycle on cycle paths because they are not fit for my purpose.
Shared cycle/pedestrian paths differentiated by coloured tarmac isn't designed for 20+mph cycling.
(Unfortunately for car drivers it seems many roads aren't designed for 20+mph driving either, at the moment).
Obviously out with the kids etc where there's a path, we use it.
Also many paths appear to be laid more as a number crunching government exercise than part of an integrated transport policy.
A classic example of this is Climping, t'other side of Littlehampton.
From west to east, the cricket club to the river, there is a massive wide lovely cycle path, that never gets used.
It doesn't get used because at the river bridge not only does the path stop, so does the tarmac, there's nothing other than the road to safely take the cyclist into L'ton.
The road is wide enough to ride and drive, but that doesn't stop a few nimrods shouting as they drive past, which I understand, it's bloody frustrating.
To make matters worse the council are doubling down, spending x millions extending the path through to Flansham next to a dead straight, flat, hardly cycled, wide road, making 5 miles of unused path ending at a grass verge 1 mile from anywhere.
There's always going to be 'issues' based on the cyclists, drivers and vehicles concerned.Interesting thanks.
It's funny you mention the path in Climping because that was one of the ones I was thinking about.
I would say though that from personal experience that road is not wide enough to both ride and drive when cars are travelling in both directions. When my daughter was learning to drive we had to follow a cyclist all the way from the roundabout by the cricket club to the Tesco roundabout. She was the first car behind the cyclist and simply couldn't get past. It was very stressful with huge train of cars behind.
Yes - I was irritated by it - but at least understand a bit more now. [emoji106]
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
So why do cyclists cycle on the road when there's a perfectly good cycle lane?
Doesn't seem an unreasonable question to me....
And yes I'm a cyclist.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
So why do cyclists cycle on the road when there's a perfectly good cycle lane?
Doesn't seem an unreasonable question to me....
And yes I'm a cyclist.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
And a very good question.
I can not get my head around cyclists not using cycle lanes.
Cyclists should show consideration and if they notice a huge trail of cars building up behind them. Just pull over, if it's safe to do so and let a few cars go by, keep the traffic flowing. It's not rocket science. Like in a traffic jam, let a few cars out of side streets here and there as it keeps things moving.
Cyclists should show consideration and if they notice a huge trail of cars building up behind them. Just pull over, if it's safe to do so and let a few cars go by, keep the traffic flowing. It's not rocket science. Like in a traffic jam, let a few cars out of side streets here and there as it keeps things moving.
And a very good question.
I can not get my head around cyclists not using cycle lanes.
The ones in Brighton, around the Old Steine, are completely useless, as they are virtually impossible to follow and stop abruptly
It's so rare though, I cycle all over Sussex, will wave cars passed if I can see ahead is clear, but I've never experienced cars stuck behind me for more than a minute or two at most. Not saying it doesn't happen, just that in my experience it's very rare.
The last place I want cars is behind me, where I can't see them.Cyclists should show consideration and if they notice a huge trail of cars building up behind them. Just pull over, if it's safe to do so and let a few cars go by, keep the traffic flowing. It's not rocket science. Like in a traffic jam, let a few cars out of side streets here and there as it keeps things moving.
I don't know of any!
Any in particular? The one from Piddinghoe to Lewes and the one from Falmer to Woodingdean are both made of loose gravel, and therefore instant punctures if you're on a road bike. They are also shared use and therefore full of children and unrestrained dogs.
The one from Ringmer to Lewes would be decent but is chock-full of pedestrians and dogs.
The one from Lewes to Beddingham looks pretty good but the only time I tried to cycle it some bloke with three toddlers was walking down it and I had to stop. The A27 at this point is wide enough to cycle on without holding up traffic anyway.
The ones in Brighton, around the Old Steine, are completely useless, as they are virtually impossible to follow and stop abruptly.
The one on Dyke Road is full of parked cars, except for a few sections where it is full of drains and potholes.
The one along Brighton seafront is full of tourists looking everywhere but where they're going.
They have fantastic cycle paths everywhere else in Europe, but not here.
Newhaven to Seaford.
I know if I still cycled or decided to take up cycling again I would use that cycle path. It's well away from the road and well away from that dangerous part of the A259.