I actually won't ignore it i just think 4 wins in 23 is not good enough. Make what you will.
.[/QUOTE
Who's getting entertainment its getting worse game by game
Its not, this was a bazillion times better than the WBA performance.
I actually won't ignore it i just think 4 wins in 23 is not good enough. Make what you will.
.[/QUOTE
Who's getting entertainment its getting worse game by game
Its not, this was a bazillion times better than the WBA performance.
I actually won't ignore it i just think 4 wins in 23 is not good enough. Make what you will.
.[/QUOTE
Who's getting entertainment its getting worse game by game
I was about to throw you a lifebelt, but my phones ringing
I actually won't ignore it i just think 4 wins in 23 is not good enough. Make what you will.
.[/QUOTE
Who's getting entertainment its getting worse game by game
Let me give you a bit of advice.
Don't reply to your own posts.
It's undignified
Let me give you a bit of advice.
Don't reply to your own posts.
It's undignified [/QUOTE
But true!
Let me give you a bit of advice.
Don't reply to your own posts.
It's undignified [/QUOTE
But true!
And who are you to say so anyway?
And who are you to say so anyway?
genius
I'm sold.
Potter OUTTTT!
genius
I'm sold.
Potter OUTTTT!
Won't be long to you actually mean it so keep on pretending.
Just Giving you the Stats Brother 4 wins in 24. Not bothered by your response that's my opinion after 44 years of watching the Albion.
Sorry, don't believe you are 50+ - you are clearly a spotty teenager who think they is 'ard!
4 wins in 23. Potter get rid. But as Tim but dim said bloody nice bloke.
It's up to 26 now FYIWell done. You made the "4 wins in 23" (now 25) games the main way of measuring the results. No one says 4 wins in 16 games (= since restart). No one says 24 points. Just 4 wins in 23. Because it fits the agenda some people have.
You influenced a significant number of people with this post. You are the King.
It's up to 26 now FYI
Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
Well done. You made the "4 wins in 23" (now 25) games the main way of measuring the results. No one says 4 wins in 16 games (= since restart). No one says 24 points. Just 4 wins in 23. Because it fits the agenda some people have.
You influenced a significant number of people with this post. You are the King.
Its not an agenda its a fact and its now 4 in 26 whatever way you want to break it down.
Any particular reason you are using the example "4 in 26" rather than "4 in 16", when realistically speaking games played in June onwards got more relevance than the dire shit in the beginning of the year?
4 wins in 23. Potter get rid. But as Tim but dim said bloody nice bloke.