The way that PB has treated this incident may have backfired.
My personal thoughts. I have to pass the away fans both before and after the game and feel very safe (I'm from the 70's and been there in mass brawls). It's great to see families at the matches, both at home and away along with away families at the Amex. Football is great again. The stewards have a job to do and again I cant fault them. Both at home and away they are always smiling and chatty. You needed to be there in the 70's to understand the way fans were treated. If 1 in 10,000 fans are bad now then maybe the same with stewards, but I've yet to meet one.
But my Mum is an outsider listening and watching PB on all the TV and Radio and is thinking that it is dangerous to go to a match now. She is asking if it was correct to take my 6 YO granddaughter last week.
Yes, make it known to fans that violence will result in a ban but I think PB may have overstepped the mark here.
What we don't know is how the interview was edited. PB may well have said something that this is a very minute element of our support and could well have cited statistics to support that but that might have been edited out, either for time constraints or because it diluted the sensationalism of the piece. I suspect that everyone that goes to the Amex fully appreciates how safe it is, especially those that were familiar with the bad old days of the 70s and 80s.