[Albion] Bart

[DJ NOBO]

Impressive. He looked far more convincing than he did in America

 

[Greg Bobkin]

Play 'em both. That'll help stop the barcodes scoring!

 

[sussex_guy2k2]

Disruptive? How? Did he make any errors? No. Yet you contradict yourself by stating he wasn’t directly responsible for the goals.

There’s no contradiction there. If you’re a defender and you’re used to playing with one goalkeeper, you’re used to his style, his communication etc, then a change of keeper leaves seeds of doubt.

So whilst he wasn’t directly responsible for the goals, the impact of the change to Bart could well partially or fully explain the poor performances of Webster and Dunk, in particular.

Not that they or RDZ would ever admit this to the public, of course. But anyone that’s ever played football to any level knows it has an impact. And when you’re playing at the top level, where a 1% difference in performance can lead to a different result, it’s quite a big deal.

So again, I’d love to know what RDZs logic was…

And thanks for offering absolutely nothing other than abuse in your post by the way, rather than attempting with some of your own logic to answer my post. I guess the NSC idiot contingent is still pretty prevalent.

 

[sussex_guy2k2]

So by implication you are saying that Steele would have stopped all three goals? Oh well, forget the fact that Bart was left totally exposed on all of them.

No one is saying that. Good God you’re thick. We already have a team that has issues in it. That much is clear to anyone with half a football brain. The midfield is causing us issues, as is right back, and we’re still waiting to bed in our new CB who’s not been fit. So why risk upsetting the apple cart further by playing a young lad in goal, who doesn’t know the system, who’s never played Premier League football, when your usual first choice keeper, the one you made such a big deal of promoting the previous season, has had a good start to the season, and when he’s still fit and available?

Now, try and engage your brain and enter the conversation with something other than ignorance and stupidity.

 

[phoenix]

No one is saying that. Good God you’re thick. We already have a team that has issues in it. That much is clear to anyone with half a football brain. The midfield is causing us issues, as is right back, and we’re still waiting to bed in our new CB who’s not been fit. So why risk upsetting the apple cart further by playing a young lad in goal, who doesn’t know the system, who’s never played Premier League football, when your usual first choice keeper, the one you made such a big deal of promoting the previous season, has had a good start to the season, and when he’s still fit and available?

Now, try and engage your brain and enter the conversation with something other than ignorance and stupidity.

Sometimes you may not agree but there is absolutly no need for this. Lets try to respect our other members thanks.

 

[dazzer6666]

No one is saying that. Good God you’re thick. We already have a team that has issues in it. That much is clear to anyone with half a football brain. The midfield is causing us issues, as is right back, and we’re still waiting to bed in our new CB who’s not been fit. So why risk upsetting the apple cart further by playing a young lad in goal, who doesn’t know the system, who’s never played Premier League football, when your usual first choice keeper, the one you made such a big deal of promoting the previous season, has had a good start to the season, and when he’s still fit and available?

Now, try and engage your brain and enter the conversation with something other than ignorance and stupidity.

Maybe, based on the hours and hours of training (suggesting he doesn’t know the system is naive) he’s had with the squad already, RdeZ thinks he’s a) ready and b) a better keeper. That would be reason enough for playing him. So, the risk of upsetting the apple cart is balanced by the potential to improve the squad.

 

[phoenix]

Maybe, based on the hours and hours of training (suggesting he doesn’t know the system is naive) he’s had with the squad already, RdeZ thinks he’s a) ready and b) a better keeper. That would be reason enough for playing him. So, the risk of upsetting the apple cart is balanced by the potential to improve the squad.

That is also the RDZ philosophy he wants and needs at least 2 players for each position. How will that happen if you don't give these players a chance.

 

[TottonSeagull]

No one is saying that. Good God you’re thick. We already have a team that has issues in it. That much is clear to anyone with half a football brain. The midfield is causing us issues, as is right back, and we’re still waiting to bed in our new CB who’s not been fit. So why risk upsetting the apple cart further by playing a young lad in goal, who doesn’t know the system, who’s never played Premier League football, when your usual first choice keeper, the one you made such a big deal of promoting the previous season, has had a good start to the season, and when he’s still fit and available?

Now, try and engage your brain and enter the conversation with something other than ignorance and stupidity.

Try to answer a post without the play ground tantrums and name calling. You have your opinion and EP is allowed his without some keyboard warrior calling him ‘thick‘ or ignorant and stupid.
I happen to agree him with him that playing Bart made no difference to our CBs playing like thy had just met and being bullied by WHU‘s big forward. Maybe I am ignorant and stupid as well!