I know the evidence was thin on the ground but still find this suprising news, wonder who did kill her then
I know the evidence was thin on the ground but still find this suprising news, wonder who did kill her then
she was forced to kneel down outside her house and shot once in the head with a specially treated bullet. That is a professional hit, not the work of the local nutter.
There was a good thread on this a while back, and a fair few of us couldn't believe he had got convicted on basically no evidence. It was only circumstantial (ie he was a bit strange). The police were desperate, and the jury seem to have agreed that him being odd doesn't make him a murderer.
Loads of things about it were odd, not least that she was forced to kneel down outside her house and shot once in the head with a specially treated bullet. That is a professional hit, not the work of the local nutter.
its unjustifiable because of miscarriages of justice , its not TOTALLY unjustifiable.I think it was George Barry. This verdict does give further proof that the death penalty is totally unjustifiable.
Loads of things about it were odd, not least that she was forced to kneel down outside her house and shot once in the head with a specially treated bullet. That is a professional hit, not the work of the local nutter.
This is the English legal systems cogs turning in a way which intrigues me.
He has been let off, but almost certainly did it - but has the right to be defended and let off if the evidence is not there to convict- the law enforcement agencies have to evolve with this news.
10 guilty walking the streets or one innocent banged up for life......i know which i would prefer....
its unjustifiable because of miscarriages of justice , its not TOTALLY unjustifiable.
Interesting concept. Presume you would be happy to be that one innocent?
Funny looking bloke. Clearly a killer of TV personalities.
.
.
.
.
.
.
or not, as it turns out.