Can I just ask why people are sayng it should be removed? I'm not suggesting they are wrong, just curious as I'm not sure why it should be. The thread title makes an assumption but the actual post was put on a forum that anyone could access.
Too true.
Just shows the small mindedness of some on here and the fact they must blame somebody.
Does Barratt even post on here?
He does, but not much as he is too busy making up non stories and looking at his johnson, saying "thats well nice"
Not very impressive that an Argus reporter is referring to people in the public domain in that manner.
Barrett bought me a pint of Wrongbow last Friday night, I feel ASHAMED
That's fine, by all means set things straight with your mates. But I'm not sure I'd want an employee of mine who is meant to be seen as a credible reporter making references like "NSC is full of complete f***ing RETARDS" in the public domain.
I'm not sure I'd want an employee of mine who is meant to be seen as a credible reporter making references like "NSC is full of complete f***ing RETARDS" in the public domain.
It is, though.
That's fine, by all means set things straight with your mates. But I'm not sure I'd want an employee of mine who is meant to be seen as a credible reporter making references like "NSC is full of complete f***ing RETARDS" in the public domain.
It is, though.
Can I just ask why people are sayng it should be removed? I'm not suggesting they are wrong, just curious as I'm not sure why it should be. The thread title makes an assumption but the actual post was put on a forum that anyone could access.
It is, though.