SK1NT
Well-known member
Thatcher's
That's just fast typing... Whats an apostrophe between friends where as the use of "come" in a past sense sentence instead of "came" is all too frustrating.
Thatcher's
If Thatchers government hadn't sold all the Silver Brown may not have sold the gold.
ma·jor·i·ty**
/məˈjôrətē/
Noun
The greater number: "in the majority of cases"; "a majority decision".
The number by which votes for one candidate in an election are more than those for all other
This has not been the case since the collapse of the Bretton Woods system in 1971; and the UK has not had a 'proper' gold standard (which is the term for having a currency supported by a hoard of gold) since 1931 (Bretton Woods tied sterling to the dollar, and the US at that time were willing to exchange dollars directly for gold).
There's been a (primarily academic) discussion about the role of fiat currency (the current system, where central banks print as much money as they like) in the financial/economic crisis and how alternative systems might work (or otherwise). But as of yet no country (to my knowledge) has been brave enough to try. There is an argument that Bitcoins (or at least the model behind them) might become a viable alternative, although with no intrinsic value (beyond what people are willing to pay for them) and a limited supply its difficult to see a mainstream future for them.
This has not been the case since the collapse of the Bretton Woods system in 1971; and the UK has not had a 'proper' gold standard (which is the term for having a currency supported by a hoard of gold) since 1931 (Bretton Woods tied sterling to the dollar, and the US at that time were willing to exchange dollars directly for gold).
There's been a (primarily academic) discussion about the role of fiat currency (the current system, where central banks print as much money as they like) in the financial/economic crisis and how alternative systems might work (or otherwise). But as of yet no country (to my knowledge) has been brave enough to try. There is an argument that Bitcoins (or at least the model behind them) might become a viable alternative, although with no intrinsic value (beyond what people are willing to pay for them) and a limited supply its difficult to see a mainstream future for them.
I think you need to check your facts there as I don't think you have got one right.
The govt borrow by issuing Gilts which are owned by all sorts of institutions including your pension fund if you have one. They don't borrow from high street banks I can assure you. If you are talking about other countries borrowing from the European Central Bank, well that is not really a bank. It's like the Bank of England for European countries and "owned" by those countries own national banks. There are no shady families benefiting from their loans.
So you've read the dictionary and posted the definition which supports what I've said. Was that an apology I heard?
Ha.... it contradicts your ramblings....never mind.
The Gold Standard wasn't a term for having a currency supported by a hoard of gold. It was the term for the value of gold being the same around the world (for those in the Gold Standard), and each nation's currency being valued against that. Sterling came off the Gold Standard in 1931, as you say, meaning it no longer valued its currency against the Gold Standard of the world, but it still backed the value of Sterling against its own gold reserves. When we came off the Gold Standard, our currency became a floating currency, that is, its value went up and down in relation to other currencies, but its value was still backed up by our own gold. Brown sold the gold to increased the Bank of England's holdings in currency, but currencies are far less stable than gold, and critics have said that this action affected the global financial market. The money in our pockets is a representative thing. It represents the backup it has of the Bank of England's holdings, whether in gold, other currencies or bonds. If the value of any of those changes, that affects the value of the pound in our pocket.
Since you're so positive that most of the population disliked thatcher can you give me a breakdown (percentage wise) of the amount of people who DIDN'T vote ,albeit through apathy or whatever ,who were anti thatcher ? It just strikes me that if she was as reviled as some on here claim then people would've been busting a gut to vote her out.Jesus H Christ...it does not. If only 40% voted for Thatcher, then 60% - the greater number - the majority - did not.
You do know 60 is a larger number than 40? This is primary school stuff.
Since you're so positive that most of the population disliked thatcher can you give me a breakdown (percentage wise) of the amount of people who DIDN'T vote ,albeit through apathy or whatever ,who were anti thatcher ? It just strikes me that if she was as reviled as some on here claim then people would've been busting a gut to vote her out.
If Thatchers government hadn't sold all the Silver Brown may not have sold the gold.
Thatcher sold the family silver to pay off the costs of the disastrous Labour policies of the 70s. Brown sold the gold to pay off the costs of his own disastrous policies.
Exactly, I already asked but got no reply as to why the people who actually voted who weren't Tory didn't all vote for Labour as a protest rather than vote for the libs to remove the devil that was Thatcher.
You might as well ask why, if the majority supported Thatcher, the majority voted for someone else. That is actually relevant to the point at issue, whereas your question isn't.
You might as well ask why, if the majority supported Thatcher, the majority voted for someone else. That is actually relevant to the point at issue, whereas your question isn't.
But the majority didn't vote against her, they voted in favour of somebody else.
All depends on what spin you want to put on it.
Thank you. As you say, the MAJORITY voted for someone else. Which is absolutely all that I have been saying
You don't actually vote in this country according to your location.
Thank you. As you say, the MAJORITY voted for someone else. Which is absolutely all that I have been saying