Peter Grummit
Well-known member
The key test in this debate is, what would we do if he were injured?
I suggest we would be severely diminished. Murray/Hemed has been hit-and-miss. No-one else at the Club can quite play the role we need: as Naylor points out today, his is the only position for which we do not have cover.
For those who complain that 'he runs around a lot without achieving much', it is his workrate that allows us to play 4-4-2 without being overrun in midfield. First half v Fulham, I would suggest, is the exception that proves the rule. Baldock didn't play well, but he changed his Duracells at halftime and put in an unbelievable 2nd half performance.
We are walking a tightrope in managing without cover for him. Injury/suspension for a striker is our biggest risk currently.
PG
I suggest we would be severely diminished. Murray/Hemed has been hit-and-miss. No-one else at the Club can quite play the role we need: as Naylor points out today, his is the only position for which we do not have cover.
For those who complain that 'he runs around a lot without achieving much', it is his workrate that allows us to play 4-4-2 without being overrun in midfield. First half v Fulham, I would suggest, is the exception that proves the rule. Baldock didn't play well, but he changed his Duracells at halftime and put in an unbelievable 2nd half performance.
We are walking a tightrope in managing without cover for him. Injury/suspension for a striker is our biggest risk currently.
PG